<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \bartext{Workshop Reports}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Scientific Drilling</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Sci. Dril.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1816-3459</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/sd-24-61-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Developing community-based scientific priorities and new drilling proposals
in the southern Indian and southwestern Pacific oceans</article-title><alt-title>Developing community-based scientific priorities and new drilling proposals</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Developing community-based scientific priorities and new drilling proposals}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R.~McKay et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>McKay</surname><given-names>Robert</given-names></name>
          <email>robert.mckay@vuw.ac.nz</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5602-6985</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Exon</surname><given-names>Neville</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>Dietmar</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3334-5764</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Gohl</surname><given-names>Karsten</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9558-2116</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Gurnis</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Shevenell</surname><given-names>Amelia</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Henrys</surname><given-names>Stuart</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7164-5274</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8 aff9">
          <name><surname>Inagaki</surname><given-names>Fumio</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2887-6525</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff10">
          <name><surname>Pandey</surname><given-names>Dhananjai</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11">
          <name><surname>Whiteside</surname><given-names>Jessica</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff12">
          <name><surname>van de Flierdt</surname><given-names>Tina</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Naish</surname><given-names>Tim</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff13">
          <name><surname>Heuer</surname><given-names>Verena</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1856-116X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Morono</surname><given-names>Yuki</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8928-4254</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff14">
          <name><surname>Coffin</surname><given-names>Millard</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff15">
          <name><surname>Godard</surname><given-names>Marguerite</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-5135</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Wallace</surname><given-names>Laura</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Kodaira</surname><given-names>Shuichi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5774-2561</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff16">
          <name><surname>Bijl</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1710-4012</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff17">
          <name><surname>Collot</surname><given-names>Julien</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff18">
          <name><surname>Dickens</surname><given-names>Gerald</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2869-4860</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff19">
          <name><surname>Dugan</surname><given-names>Brandon </given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff20">
          <name><surname>Dunlea</surname><given-names>Ann G.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1251-1441</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff21">
          <name><surname>Hackney</surname><given-names>Ron</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff22">
          <name><surname>Ikehara</surname><given-names>Minoru</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2695-4713</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff23">
          <name><surname>Jutzeler</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11">
          <name><surname>McNeill</surname><given-names>Lisa</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff24">
          <name><surname>Naik</surname><given-names>Sushant</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff14">
          <name><surname>Noble</surname><given-names>Taryn</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Opdyke</surname><given-names>Bradley</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff25">
          <name><surname>Pecher</surname><given-names>Ingo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7397-5069</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff26">
          <name><surname>Stott</surname><given-names>Lowell</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Uenzelmann-Neben</surname><given-names>Gabriele</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0115-5923</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff24">
          <name><surname>Vadakkeykath</surname><given-names>Yatheesh</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff27">
          <name><surname>Wortmann</surname><given-names>Ulrich G.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7854-9173</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Antarctic Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, 0200, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW2006, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>College of Marine Science, University of South Florida, Saint Petersburg, FL 33701, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>GNS Science, Lower Hutt, 5040, New Zealand</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama 236-0001, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research, JAMSTEC, Nankoku, Kochi 783-8502, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Research, Vāsco Da Gāma, Goa-403 804, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff12"><label>12</label><institution>Department of Earth Science &amp; Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff13"><label>13</label><institution>Organic Geochemistry Group, MARUM Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff14"><label>14</label><institution>Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff15"><label>15</label><institution>Géosciences Montpellier, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff16"><label>16</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff17"><label>17</label><institution>Service Géologique de Nouvelle-Calédonie, Nouméa, New Caledonia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff18"><label>18</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff19"><label>19</label><institution>Department of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401-1887, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff20"><label>20</label><institution>Department of Geology &amp; Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff21"><label>21</label><institution>Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT 2609, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff22"><label>22</label><institution>Center for Advanced Marine Core Research, Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff23"><label>23</label><institution>School of Natural Sciences and Centre for Ore Deposit and Earth Sciences (CODES), <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff24"><label>24</label><institution>CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa-403 004, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff25"><label>25</label><institution>School of Environment, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff26"><label>26</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff27"><label>27</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, 22 Russell Street, ON, M5S 3B1, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Robert McKay (robert.mckay@vuw.ac.nz)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>October</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>24</volume>
      <fpage>61</fpage><lpage>70</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>3</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e577">An International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) workshop
was held at Sydney University, Australia, from 13 to 16 June 2017 and was
attended by 97 scientists from 12 countries. The aim of the workshop was to
investigate future drilling opportunities in the eastern Indian Ocean,
southwestern Pacific Ocean, and the Indian and Pacific sectors of the Southern
Ocean. The overlying regional sedimentary strata are underexplored relative
to their Northern Hemisphere counterparts, and thus the role of the Southern
Hemisphere in past global environmental change is poorly constrained. A
total of 23 proposal ideas were discussed, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 of these
deemed mature enough for active proposal development or awaiting scheduled
site survey cruises. Of the remaining 11 proposals, key regions were
identified where fundamental hypotheses are testable by drilling, but either
site surveys are required or hypotheses need further development.
Refinements are anticipated based upon regional IODP drilling in 2017/2018,
analysis of recently collected site survey data, and the development of site
survey proposals. We hope and expect that this workshop will lead to a new
phase of scientific ocean drilling in the Australasian region in the early
2020s.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page62?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e594">The importance of the Southern Hemisphere in the narratives of global plate
tectonics and oceanography is well established, but understudied. This is in
large part due to the vastness of the eastern Indian Ocean, southwestern
Pacific Ocean, and the Indian and Pacific sectors of the Southern Ocean.
This is an ideal region to address many of the 14 science challenges in the
2013–2023 IODP science plan. The Australian and Indian continents have
undergone the largest and most rapid paleo-latitudinal shifts of any
continents globally since 150 Ma. The region boasts the following: (i) arguably the
greatest diversity of subduction zones from fully seismically coupled to
uncoupled; (ii) extensive shallow marine seas and submerged continents (e.g.,
Zealandia) with extraordinary and unstudied stratigraphic records; and (iii) the largest suite of plume-related products and the
largest mantle cold spot. Sampling of plateaus, ridges, and their associated
sedimentary strata will provide an enormous wealth of information about
their origin and address fundamental paleoceanographic and paleoclimate
questions. Drilling of the Antarctic margin in the Indian Ocean and South
Pacific sectors will increase our understanding of the Antarctic cryosphere
and global climate evolution and past land and sea ice extent from the
Cretaceous through the Cenozoic. Geomicrobiological questions can be
addressed on a number of expeditions, including targeted expeditions to
study the deep biosphere in a variety of tectonic settings. Petrological and
geochemical studies of oceanic, back-arc and arc crust, as well as uplifted
mantle remain a high priority, as do those of geological hazards.</p>
      <p id="d1e597">To facilitate and nurture cross-disciplinary proposals, workshop breakout
sessions focused on distinct tectonic settings and their associated
paleo-environmental evolution. These included (1) large igneous provinces and
associated paleoceanography, (2) subduction zones and associated
paleoceanography, (3) a separate focus group on the Hikurangi subduction
zone, (4) conjugate margin/Zealandia studies and associated paleoceanography,
and (5) a biosphere frontiers subgroup meeting not related to the above
tectonic settings. The potential proposals discussed in the breakout sessions are listed in Table 1, and locations shown in
Fig. 1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e602">Location map of potential proposals discussed in the workshop,
with color-coded dots denoting the main theme for each proposal. Small
colored circles indicate previous (and planned) drilling by the Deep Sea
Drilling Project (DSDP), Ocean Drilling Program (ODP), and IODP. Larger
circles and diamonds are projects discussed in the meeting and are colored
by theme, and numbered according to sections discussed in text. Large
circles indicate proposals that appear mature enough to develop
pre-proposals. Large diamonds require site survey proposals to be developed,
or are awaiting the results of upcoming drilling in the region (e.g.,
Hikurangi subduction zone and Lord Howe Rise regions) and may require a
focus workshop to further refine hypotheses.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/24/61/2018/sd-24-61-2018-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e615">List of proposals discussed in the workshop, lead contacts and
current status for each proposal. Number relates to section number in main
text.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="15pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="160pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="129pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="left">Short title </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Science lead(s)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Status</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3" align="left">Large igneous provinces and associated paleooceanography </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Manihiki Plateau/Magellan Rise LIP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Gerald Dickens</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ready for pre-proposal</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hikurangi Plateau LIP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Christian Timm/Jörg Geldmacher</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Site survey scheduled 2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kerguelen LIP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Gabriele Uenzelmann-Neben</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Site survey scheduled</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PePSI-SO (Conrad Rise)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Minoru Ikehara</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Pre-proposal submitted 2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wombat Plateau</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jessica Whiteside</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Site survey data required</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="left">Subduction inputs </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Andaman back-arc basin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Yatheesh Vadakkeyakath</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ready for pre-proposal</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">New Caledonia peridotitic ophiolite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Julien Collot</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Focus workshop required 2018</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Puysegur subduction initiation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Michael Gurnis</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Site survey scheduled 2018</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sumatra intraplate earthquakes</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lisa McNeill</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ready for pre-proposal</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3" align="left">Eastern NZ region (Hikurangi subduction zone, Canterbury Basin)  </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hikurangi subduction inputs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ake Fagereng</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Develop pre-proposal after IODP 372/375</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hikurangi slow slip fluid flow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ingo Pecher</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Develop pre-proposal after IODP 372/375</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Canterbury Basin freshwater resources</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Aaron Micallef</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ready for pre-proposal</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kermadec volcanism</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Martin Jutzeler</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Focus workshop required 2018</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="left">Conjugate margins </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Chatham Rise pockmarks and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lowell Stott</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Pre-proposal submitted Oct. 2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Chatham Rise tectonics and climate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Karsten Gohl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Focus workshop required</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Totten Glacier ice sheet evolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Amelia Shevenell</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Pre-proposal submitted Oct. 2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sabrina Coast slope deposits</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Brad Opdyke</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ready for pre-proposal</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SE Indian Ocean ridge geodynamics and <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>climate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Dietmar Müller</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Site survey data required</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Indian Ocean dipole and monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sushant Naik</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Site survey data required</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Future Drilling in Northern Zealandia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ron Hackney</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Focus workshop required 2018</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Australian-Antarctic transect</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Peter Bijl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Site survey data required</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="left">Biosphere </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Great Australian Bight hydrogeology and <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>biosphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ulrich Wortmann</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Pre-proposal submitted Oct. 2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">South Pacific Gyre/Southern Ocean <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>biosphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fumio Inagaki/Ann Dunlea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Site survey data required</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Large igneous provinces and associated paleoceanography</title>
      <p id="d1e1065">Earth's evolution includes multiple, geologically brief episodes when
extraordinary volcanism occurred across some surface regions. Documentation
for this comes from large igneous provinces (LIPs), extensive areas covered
by thick layers of mostly mafic material that was emplaced on million-year
timescales. While LIPs have been widely acknowledged and discussed by the
geoscience community for more than two decades, major first-order questions
regarding their origin and environmental impact remain. Profound and rapid
changes in biota and chemical cycling have also punctuated Earth's history
and many of these ”events” have been linked to the formation of LIPs. For
example, massive volcanic outpouring may have been coupled to large
increases in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which could have raised surface
temperatures, amplified the hydrological cycle, and changed ocean
circulation. Equally important is the fact that oceanic LIPs typically lie
above the carbonate compensation depth, thereby providing the elevated
foundation on which many outstanding records of Earth's climate history
accumulate.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Manihiki-Plus: ground zero for understanding large igneous provinces and
their environmental impact</title>
      <p id="d1e1089">Manihiki Plateau, in the southwestern Pacific, is a large (770 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
bathymetric high, which appears to have been emplaced about 125–120 Ma. Five
drill sites are proposed, four on Manihiki Plateau and one on the older
Magellan Rise. Numerous hypothesis could consequently be addressed: (1) Manihiki
Plateau was part of a much larger LIP that has been disjointed since the
Cretaceous (other components are believed to include the Ontong Java and
Hikurangi<?pagebreak page63?> plateaus); (2) the environmental impacts of LIP emplacement can be
monitored by syn-LIP sedimentation at proximal older locations, especially
Magellan Rise; and (3) the sedimentary records on top of Manihiki Plateau and
Magellan Rise hold the paleoceanographic history of the Central Pacific from
the Late Jurassic to present, as the two locations lie beneath the eastern
end of the Pacific warm pool.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Hikurangi Plateau large igneous province</title>
      <p id="d1e1110">Drilling on the Hikurangi Plateau will yield insights into the mantle source
and LIP emplacement rates, and help to constrain geodynamic models and
environmental impacts of LIP emplacement. It will also enable testing of the
hypothesis that Ontong Java, Manihiki, and Hikurangi were once part of a
single super-LIP, and will allow controls on subduction megathrust slip
behavior to be studied. Upcoming drilling on IODP expeditions 372 and 375
will provide critical information to underpin the development of such a
proposal, as will multichannel seismic reflection and refraction lines to be
acquired in November/December of this year. It was suggested that the
proponent group aim to develop a pre-proposal by October 2018, once all of
the information is available and hypotheses could be fully formulated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Kerguelen Plateau large igneous province emplacement and associated
paleoceanography</title>
      <p id="d1e1119">A multidisciplinary drilling expedition on the Kerguelen Plateau will
investigate LIP formation and Southern Ocean paleoceanography over the past
120 Ma. The Kerguelen Plateau incorporates multiple microcontinents, and has
as unknown relationship to dipping reflection sequences on the nearby
Antarctic margin. Tectonomagmatic questions include why the most voluminous
magmatism appears to have post-dated continental breakup (unlike other flood
basalts associated temporally with breakup), and how continental fragments
were isolated in the plateau. Cretaceous and Cenozoic paleoceanographic
records are well preserved in regional carbonates, and the complex
topography of the Kerguelen Plateau exerts a strong influence on the
pathways of water masses within the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC)<?pagebreak page64?> and
the Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW). In the Cenozoic era, the pathways and
intensities of Southern Ocean circulation were developed and significantly modified
by emplacement of the Kerguelen Plateau and opening of
regional tectonic gateways.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Plio-Pleistocene paleoceanography of the southwestern Indian sector of the
Southern Ocean (PePSI-SO)</title>
      <?pagebreak page65?><p id="d1e1129">A preliminary proposal (918-Pre) to drill in the Conrad Rise and Del
Caño Rise regions (Indian Ocean sector) of the Southern Ocean (SO) was
submitted to IODP in April 2017. Five high sediment accumulation sites are
proposed, with the aim to document Southern Ocean variability and
atmosphere, ocean, and cryosphere interactions in the southwestern Indian Ocean
sector. The targeted drill sites will fill important gaps in our knowledge
covering the middle Miocene cooling (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 Ma), late Miocene
carbon shift (8–6 Ma), the Pliocene climate optimum (5.3–3.3 Ma), the late
Pliocene global cooling (3.3–2.6 Ma), the mid-Pleistocene transition (MPT:
1250–700 ka), and the mid-Brunhes transition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.43 Ma). These
sites will contribute to further understanding dynamic fluctuations of the
ACC and associated meridional frontal migrations in relation to global
circulation (e.g., Agulhas Leakage, and Atlantic meridional overturning
circulation). Also investigated will be changes in inter-ocean surface and
deep-water transport, and past variability in southern Indian Ocean sea ice
extent, with implications for air–sea gas exchange and the partitioning of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between the atmosphere and the ocean interior.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Wombat in the greenhouse: sampling rare Southern Hemisphere records of
Mesozoic environmental change</title>
      <p id="d1e1161">It is proposed to drill Mesozoic sedimentary sequences on the northeastern
Wombat Plateau, on the northernmost continental margin of Australia.
Drilling during Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Leg 122 in 1988 obtained a
thick succession of Late Triassic deltaic and shallow marine sediments
unconformably overlain by Late Cretaceous pelagic sediments, including
records of Oceanic Anoxic Event (OAE) 2 and the Cretaceous–Paleogene
boundary. However, recovery was poor in part and new core from the Wombat
Plateau will provide a better understanding of early Mesozoic paleoclimate,
paleoceanography, and paleoenvironments in the Southern Hemisphere. These
sites should provide key Southern Hemisphere data for Late Triassic climate
events, including the hypothesized late Norian–Rhaetian increase in
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Carnian pluvial event, two bolide impacts, and the
far-field effects of the Central Atlantic magmatic province, a LIP
contemporaneous with the end-Triassic mass extinction. Late Cretaceous
sediments will provide an important deep-water record of dynamic
environmental changes immediately prior to the end-Cretaceous mass
extinction event.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Subduction zones</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Andaman back-arc basin: understanding crustal accretion in a sedimented
spreading region</title>
      <p id="d1e1192">The Andaman back-arc basin was formed by subduction of the Indian plate under
the Burmese plate. Linear magnetic anomalies indicate that seafloor
spreading in the Andaman basin commenced at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 Ma, but
anomalies are lacking in some sectors. Drilling in the rift valley of the
Andaman back-arc basin will provide important insights on crustal accretion
and why pronounced linear magnetic anomalies are absent in this sedimented
spreading. Drilling at the Alcock and Sewell seamounts and the inferred
location of the oldest oceanic crust will help address several salient
regional problems, such as the nature of the crust underlying the Alcock and
Sewell seamounts, and the timing of formation and evolution of the Andaman
back-arc basin.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Amphibious drilling of the New Caledonia peridotitic ophiolite, northern
Zealandia</title>
      <p id="d1e1208">The geodynamic evolution of the southwestern Pacific, from Gondwana break-up during
the Cretaceous to subduction-dominated tectonism in the Cenozoic, resulted
in the obduction of a string of peridotite ophiolites/massifs from the Anita
ophiolite in Southern New Zealand to the Papuan Ultramafic Belt ophiolite.
The New Caledonian ophiolite is one of the largest obducted peridotitic
masses in the world. An amphibious drilling proposal (ADP) will provide a
more complete understanding of an obducted deep geological system from a
terrestrial setting to its marine extension, which is as close as possible
to its unobducted mantle lithosphere counterpart. Drilling onshore and
offshore along the New Caledonia ophiolite will allow emplacement mechanisms
of mantle-dominated allochthons to be assessed, as well as constraining
high- and low-temperature alteration processes. Other objectives could
relate to studying archaeal and eubacterial communities that are known to
develop in these alkaline systems, while the formation of the world's second
largest rimmed carbonate reefs during the Miocene to Quaternary will be
investigated. Developing an ADP will require engagement of the scientific
communities associated with IODP and the International Continental
Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Testing geodynamic models for subduction initiation, mega-thrust
development, and deep biosphere development in the Puysegur Trench, south of
New Zealand</title>
      <p id="d1e1217">The Puysegur incipient subduction zone south of New Zealand is an ideal
location to constrain key geodynamic unknowns. Precise plate tectonic
constraints along with a high level of seismicity reveal the transition of
strike-slip motion along the Macquarie Ridge in the south to a clear Benioff
zone and active subduction beneath southwestern South Island of New Zealand,
in the north. It is likely that the Puysegur subduction zone is currently
transitioning from a forced to a self-sustaining state. IODP drilling around
Puysegur will allow testing and refinement of three topics fundamental to
the IODP science plan 2013–2023: (1) the forces associated with subduction
initiation, (2) the origin of subseafloor communities in the deep biosphere,
and (3) the development of fault properties in a mega-thrust environment.
Site survey data at Puysegur will be acquired with the R/V <italic>Marcus Langseth</italic> during February to
March 2018 through the South Island Subduction Initiation Experiment
(SISIE). Numerous associated paleoceanographic objectives will be addressed
by drilling in this region, including a record of terrestrial runoff from
New Zealand as the convergent plate boundary evolved, and records of
sub-Antarctic sea surface conditions and paleoproductivity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Stress state in the upper oceanic crust in a region of great intraplate
earthquakes off Sumatra</title>
      <p id="d1e1229">The world's largest known intraplate earthquakes have occurred in the
subducting Indian Plate offshore Sumatra, and have raised many questions
about the genesis of such events. IODP Expedition 362 had two prospective
sites approved for drilling (SUMA-22A and SUMA-23A) located 10–20 km to the
north and south of the epicenter of one of these major<?pagebreak page66?> intraplate
earthquakes. Although approved for drilling, the sites were not drilled
during Expedition 362 due to time constraints. However, these sites provide
a unique opportunity to investigate the stress state in the region of these
great intraplate earthquakes, and also to advance understanding of the
sedimentary sequence entering the Sumatra subduction zone farther north,
thereby building on the goals of Expedition 362. Depending on the scope,
either an APL or a full proposal is planned to follow up on Expedition 362
objectives, and to investigate the state of stress state in upper oceanic
crust near these highly seismogenic fracture zones.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>New Zealand region: subduction inputs on Hikurangi Plateau, Hikurangi
margin episodic fluid flow, Canterbury Basin fresh water, plus eruptive
processes on Kermadec Ridge</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Hikurangi subduction inputs</title>
      <p id="d1e1244">The Hikurangi margin of New Zealand is arguably one of the best locales on
the planet to resolve controls on subduction megathrust slip behavior due
to the strong along-strike variations in subduction interface slip
behavior. The nature of the material entering the subduction zone on the
subducting Pacific Plate likely exerts a strong control on these
along-strike variations in slip behavior. This proposal will acquire cores
and logs sampling the incoming sedimentary section and underlying Hikurangi
Plateau at several sites along the Hikurangi Plateau (from north to south).
These sites will illuminate along-strike variations in the sedimentary
section and underlying Hikurangi Plateau, and how these variations in
lithology and fluid content may influence locked versus creeping behavior at
subduction megathrusts. It will target portions of the plateau where the
sedimentary cover is less than several hundred meters, well east of the
deformation front, to avoid thick trench-fill sections near the Hikurangi
Trough. We will also target expanded sections of the portions of incoming
stratigraphy that correlate with where the plate boundary décollement is
forming.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Episodic fluid flow driven by slow slip and its impact on gas hydrate
systems on the Hikurangi margin</title>
      <p id="d1e1253">Bottom simulating reflectors (BSRs) observed at the Hikurangi subduction
margin and their relationship to geothermal heat flow changes suggest that
regional gas hydrate systems may be strongly influenced by episodic fluid
flow processes. These processes may be driven by large strain transients
that occur during episodic slow slip events. This proposal seeks to install
subseafloor observatories to monitor pore pressure and temperature changes
throughout the slow slip cycle. Genius plugs with osmotic samplers could
undertake time-series sampling of fluids to evaluate changes in geochemistry
with time. These observatories will enable evaluation of the impact of fluid
pulsing on gas hydrate systems, and also quantify the degree of overpressure
that builds up beneath hydrate systems during and between fluid pulsing,
potentially driven by slow slip events. The latter could also play a role in
submarine slope stability processes. Installation of a denser network of
simple observatories will also enable more detailed spatiotemporal
investigation of the distribution of offshore slow slip events, allowing
many questions about shallow slow slip distribution and its impact on
hydrogeology in the upper plate to be addressed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Offshore freshwater resources in the Canterbury Basin</title>
      <p id="d1e1262">Results from IODP Expedition 317 in the Canterbury Basin showed a freshening
signature at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 m depth at Site U1353, while nearby Site
U1354 showed near-seawater salinity. This transition from a
freshwater-charged zone to a non-freshwater zone makes an interesting and
well characterized target to investigate the dynamics of, and interactions
between, freshwater and seawater subseafloor hydrological systems. Abundant
regional site survey data exist in this area, including a recent voyage that
acquired seismic and controlled source electromagnetic data, to allow
investigation of the freshwater system beneath the offshore Canterbury
Basin. A future drilling proposal will include active pumping tests and
potentially an observatory component to look at transients in these systems.
Such an effort should also be of great interest to the biological community
as the communities of freshwater and saline systems will be very different.
Evaluating the communities in the transition between these systems should
provide insights into microbiology and nutrient availability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Eruptive processes and transport in submarine volcanic environments
along the Kermadec Ridge</title>
      <p id="d1e1278">Marine volcanic eruptive processes and underwater transport/deposition of
volcanic material are poorly understood. In particular, the transport and
depositional processes during submarine eruptions, and the behavior of
pyroclastic flows as they transition from onshore to offshore environments
is understudied. In some historical cases (such as the Krakatoa eruption),
large tsunami have resulted from these processes, so understanding the
underlying mechanisms of eruption-fed volcaniclastic transport into and
under water also has important geohazard implications. Recent drilling in the
Izu–Bonin–Mariana arc system uncovered 20–100 m thick eruption-fed units, but
drilling on the flanks of submarine volcanoes is more suited to fully
investigate these processes. The Kermadec Arc is an attractive location for
such an effort, because (a) a number of submarine volcanoes have always been
submarine and also have produced eruptions with significant volume, and
(b) Macauley Island is an excellent locale to investigate pyroclastic transport
and depositional processes into the sea, where arcuate sediment waves are
observed on the order of 100 m high and 1 km long.<?pagebreak page67?> Key questions include
(1) what are the physics and processes behind submarine and coastal volcanic
eruptions and subsequent deposition of their products, and (2) are the
eruption products emplaced all at once, or do they occur in multiple
episodes?</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Conjugate margins and climate</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Did CO${}_{{2}}$ from geologic sources contribute to glacial--interglacial
$p$CO${}_{{2}}$ variability, and cause the formation of seafloor pockmarks on the
Chatham Rise, New Zealand?}?><title>Did CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from geologic sources contribute to glacial–interglacial
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variability, and cause the formation of seafloor pockmarks on the
Chatham Rise, New Zealand?</title>
      <p id="d1e1320">After three decades of scientific effort there is no definitive answer to
the question ”What Earth system processes were responsible for the
systematic variations in atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during each glacial cycle of
the late Pleistocene?” Our proposal seeks to investigate and test the
hypothesis that geologic reservoirs act as capacitors, storing large volumes
of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in marine sediments during glaciations and then leaking carbon to
the ocean and atmosphere during glacial terminations. Recent discoveries
have identified accumulations of both liquid and hydrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> solid)
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in marine sediments at a variety of tectonic settings. These
liquid and hydrate CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reservoirs can undergo phase changes as
temperature and pressure changes during glacial–interglacial cycles,
affecting the storage and leakage of carbon to the overlying ocean. Evidence
supporting this hypothesis includes large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C excursions in
marine carbonates from the last glacial–interglacial transition that point
to release of large quantities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-dead carbon to the ocean. To
date, the largest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C excursions have been documented in the
South Pacific on Chatham Rise and from the Galapagos margin. On Chatham Rise
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C excursions coincided with the formation of large
pockmarks. The pockmarks extend over an area of &gt; 20 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and have been observed in seismic profiles in association with previous
glacial terminations. The close temporal relationship between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C excursions and the formation of pockmarks points to a causal
relationship whereby CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> released from geologic reservoirs on Chatham
Rise during the glacial–interglacial transition produced the pockmarks. The
proposal sets forth a plan to investigate and test this hypothesis by
obtaining and then studying sediment records from Chatham Rise that span
each of the glacial cycles of the late Pleistocene.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Southeastern Chatham Rise margin: tectonics, dynamics, and
paleoceanography</title>
      <p id="d1e1445">The southeastern continental margin of Chatham Rise is conjugate to the
Amundsen Sea margin of West Antarctica. Deep crustal seismic, gravity, and
magnetic data coupled with dredged samples from seamounts reveal a complex
transition from continental to oceanic crust on both conjugate margin
segments. In particular, the southeastern Chatham Terrace is underlain by a
broad zone of thinned and fragmented transitional crust, presumably
containing continental blocks separated by zones of oceanic crust. The
nature of this type of transitional crust and the processes of its
generation during Cretaceous rifting and breakup is poorly understood. The
southern Chatham Rise is an ideal location to investigate crustal
fragmentation during continental breakup by drilling into the different
crustal zones, and could be combined with drilling into well-imaged sediment
drifts to address hypotheses related to the development and evolution of
southwestern Pacific Ocean circulation (e.g., Deep Western Boundary Current
(DWBC) and ACC) during the Cenozoic.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Totten Glacier Cenozoic ice sheet evolution and sensitivity to past
warming</title>
      <p id="d1e1454">Vulnerability of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) to climate change is
uncertain. The low-lying, glacially sculpted Aurora Subglacial Basin (ASB;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3–5 m sea-level-equivalent ice) is a major marine-based East
Antarctic catchment that drains ice from the Gamburtsev Mountains to the
Sabrina Coast. The catchment consists of several over-deepened basins and
hosts an active subglacial hydrological system, suggesting that regional ice
may be susceptible to climate variability, particularly during warm climate
intervals. New sediment records from the Sabrina Coast continental shelf
will enable us to test fundamental hypotheses related to the existence of
warm high southern latitude climates during the late Mesozoic and early
Cenozoic, and evolution of the EAIS in the ASB from the Paleogene to the
last deglaciation. The stratigraphic sequence also records variable
meltwater influence, potentially critical for understanding catchment ice
dynamics. Shelf records, though inherently discontinuous, offer advantages
over deep-sea records, including the following: (1) direct records of ice margin
fluctuations (e.g., lithologic changes, glacial erosion surfaces) and
continental conditions (e.g., vegetation, temperature, hydrology),
(2) shallow access to older strata due to tilting and glacial erosion of
overlying strata, and (3) high sedimentation rates and shallow water depths,
which favor carbonate macro- and microfossil (e.g., foraminifera, bivalves)
preservation. Drilling the Sabrina Coast shelf will be technologically
challenging. Proposed Sabrina Coast sites are located within a small
polynya, which enhances ice risks and requires a mission specific platform.
Drilling from a stable seabed drill or using ANDRILL-style riser drilling
technology from an icebreaker will maximize recovery. This accessible
archive of past Antarctic climate and ice sheet history will provide data to
improve ice sheet and climate model boundary conditions and outputs. This
type of data-model integration is required to better understand the response
of Antarctica's ice sheets to continued anthropogenic warming.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page68?><sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <title>Sabrina Coast slope deposits</title>
      <p id="d1e1471">This project aims to obtain high-latitude paleoclimate records from the
Miocene to Pleistocene of ice sheet and ocean interactions at the East
Antarctic margin to understand the history of Totten Glacier mobility and
melting. It will obtain more continuous records of the oceanic drivers and
responses to East Antarctic Ice Sheet variability than drilling on the
continental shelf. It will also seek to obtain pre-Miocene records during
past greenhouse climates, and correlation to continental shelf records in
the Totten Glacier region in the proposal above (Sect. 5.3). Extensive
seismic lines exist across the area with more than 28 crossing lines for
selection of many potential drill sites. Turbidite overbank deposits are
proposed as targets, as these were demonstrated during IODP Expedition 318
(Wilkes Land margin of East Antarctica) to provide high-resolution
continuous archives of glacially-influenced sedimentation. Critically, such
archives have proven valuable in identifying ice-sheet retreat events and
characterizing these in the context of associated oceanographic change.
Experience from an R/V <italic>Investigator</italic> voyage during January to March 2017 pointed to
favorable weather conditions for coring in this area using standard <italic>JOIDES Resolution</italic>
riserless drilling.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS5">
  <title>Southeastern Indian Ocean deep circulation and sediment drift history, basement
depth, and mantle chemistry anomalies</title>
      <p id="d1e1487">The Southern Ocean encircles a highly dynamic glaciated Antarctic margin,
and accommodates the amalgamation of several major water masses. Changes in
the vigor of this top-to-bottom current would have significant implications
for the exchange of heat between the Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic ocean
basins, and may have consequences for the ventilation and primary
productivity of the Southern Ocean. Contourite drifts are rapidly-deposited
signatures of bottom current activity, and provide high-resolution records
of paleoceanographic change. There are several lines of evidence suggesting
that the Southeast Indian Ridge (SEIR) is covered extensively by a
succession of Pleistocene to Pliocene-aged drifts. Long-term sedimentation
rates exceed 5.5 cm kyr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and focusing factors suggest extensive sediment
winnowing by lateral advection of bottom currents. Furthermore, drilling
results from Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) Site 265 indicate ”extremely
high” sedimentation rates in the Quaternary. Recent ocean circulation
numerical modeling also supports the accumulation of thick sediment drifts
on the SEIR. The SEIR lies far from any terrigenous sources that could mask
or otherwise contaminate any signals of bottom current intensity manifested
within these sediment drifts. It is straightforward to combine the climate
goals of such a proposal with petrological sampling of the
Australian–Antarctic Discordance (AAD) and the eastern SEIR, aimed at
testing alternative hypotheses about the origin of geochemical and depth
anomalies along the SEIR (westward plume/asthenospheric flow along eastern
SEIR towards the AAD versus mid-ocean ridge migration over an ancient slab
burial ground). The two issues are connected in that anomalously elevated
ridge segments act as potential obstacles along which contourites are
deposited, while anomalously deep troughs and segments of the ridge may
allow deep water to pass from one ridge flank to the other.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS6">
  <title>The Indian Ocean dipole and monsoon</title>
      <p id="d1e1508">The recovery of a sequence of Miocene to recent sediments from the eastern
equatorial Indian Ocean will help resolve the history of the Indian Ocean
dipole (IOD) on annual to tectonic timescales. The objectives of the
drilling are to understand the following: (1) the evolution of sea surface temperatures
(SSTs) in the eastern Indian Ocean since the Miocene, (2) the long-term
relationship between eastern Indian Ocean SSTs and strengthening/weakening
of the Indian monsoon, (3) the response of eastern Indian Ocean SSTs/IOD to
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> forcing, and (4) the influence of a constricted
Indonesian Throughflow (ITF) gateway at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3–4 Ma on the IOD.
We propose drilling a latitudinal transect at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90–110<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) to obtain longer timescale records as
old as early Miocene, in order to understand the evolution of SSTs and the
effect of ITF gateway closure on IOD. Furthermore, we propose drilling off the
west coast of Sumatra, which will be helpful in obtaining high-resolution
sediment cores to understand variations in the IOD at decadal to centennial
timescales. This proposal will be amalgamated with an earlier plan, which
aimed to understand Nicobar fan evolution, monsoon intensity and Himalayan
uplift, and the stress state in oceanic crust and relationship to seismicity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS7">
  <title>Future IODP drilling in northern Zealandia/Lord Howe Rise</title>
      <p id="d1e1566">Northern Zealandia and the Lord Howe Rise were drilled during IODP
Expedition 371 using <italic>JOIDES Resolution</italic> from July to September 2017, and is planned to be
drilled during a SEP/CIB-approved D/V <italic>Chikyu</italic> expedition that, subject to funding, is
scheduled for the second half of 2020 (Complementary Project Proposal
871-CPP). New opportunities for drilling in northern Zealandia will
undoubtedly emerge from the core and data collected during Expedition 371,
which is investigating Eocene Tonga-Kermadec subduction initiation and
evaluating whether a period of high-amplitude long-wavelength compression
led to initiation of subduction or determine if alternative geodynamic
models were involved. Moreover, Paleogene and Neogene sediments recovered
during Expedition 371 are also constraining paleoceanographic changes caused
by subduction initiation as well as tropical and polar climatic
teleconnections and the transition from greenhouse to icehouse climate
states. In the case of Proposal 871-CPP for deep riser drilling to
investigate Lord Howe<?pagebreak page69?> Rise crustal ribbon development, ocean biogeochemical
cycles at high southern latitudes from the Cretaceous onwards, and the
limits of life beneath the ocean floor, several proposed alternate sites may
be suitable for riserless drilling using <italic>JOIDES Resolution</italic>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1578">New site survey data obtained in support of these recent and planned
expeditions provide modern seismic coverage of the entire width of northern
Zealandia from the Norfolk Ridge to the Tasman Sea oceanic basin. These data
undoubtedly reveal a large number of additional drill sites, many of which
have not yet been considered in detail. Another possible long-term objective
in the region is to target seamounts and submerged plateaus within and to
the north of northern Zealandia where drilling could address important
geodynamic questions surrounding changes in Pacific Plate motion, and the
connections among deep mantle plumes and large igneous provinces. It was
agreed at the workshop that future plans for IODP drilling in northern
Zealandia should be revisited in mid-2018 after results from Expedition 371
begin to emerge and the status of funding and logistics for Proposal 871-CPP
is clearer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS8">
  <title>Completing the Australian–Antarctic transect</title>
      <p id="d1e1587">The Australo–Antarctic rift system affords an opportunity to document
lithosphere thinning history during continental breakup, and to understand
the transition between rift and oceanic crust formation. The peridotite
ridge in this region, representing the boundary between continental and
oceanic crust, has risen high enough to be reached with riserless drilling.
A second aim is to understand the timing, nature, and consequences of
post-rift subsidence of the outer continental shelf of both the Australian
and Antarctic margins. It is expected that post-rift subsidence was minimal,
because continental migration was compensated for by formation of oceanic
crust. Both margins should be completely independent in terms of subsidence
history as soon as oceanic crust formation commences, but evidence from IODP
Expedition 318 (Wilkes Land) suggests that the outer continental shelf of
the Antarctic margin collapsed long after oceanic crust started forming in
the rift system. Moreover, and surprisingly, seismic profiles along the
conjugate Australian and Antarctic margins show considerable symmetry.
However, on the Australian side, we lack recovered sedimentary records that
allow dating of the sediments from the seaward limit of the continental
margin. The region also has fundamental climate questions to address,
including the deep-sea expression of Eocene–Oligocene glaciation and
circum-Antarctic erosion, and the history of the development of the ACC and
spatial migration of Southern Ocean frontal systems. It was proposed to
develop a plan to drill a transect which connects the Otway–Ceduna basins
(Australian margin) and the Antarctic margin.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Biosphere</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1">
  <title>Reflux brines: linking continental shelf hydrogeology to subseafloor
microbiology</title>
      <p id="d1e1603">The role of mass transport in continental margin environments has
historically been underappreciated. Recent oceanographic tracer studies
indicate that discharge of saline groundwater from passive continental
margins occurs at rates equal to, or exceeding, river discharge. This
implies large-scale migration of saline groundwater through continental
shelf sediments and is consistent with decades of research in carbonate
diagenesis, where the importance of groundwater mass transport has long been
recognized. Sea-level pumped reflux brines, formed by evaporation of
seawater on the exposed shelf during sea-level minima, should be common in
subtropical passive margin sequences, and may provide the missing mechanism
to explain the large-scale dolomitization and mineralization processes
observed throughout Earth's history. These shelf-scale hydrological systems
may also support abundant deep microbial life on the upper shelf slope.</p>
      <p id="d1e1606">Results from ODP Leg 182 show that Great Australian Bight (GAB) likely
contains an actively discharging reflux brine system. Two transects across
the outer GAB margin were proposed to assess coupled groundwater flow,
geochemical reactions and microbial metabolic processes. Results from ODP
Leg 182 suggest that the brine-supported microbial ecosystem in the GAB
thrives under hyper-alkaline and hyper-sulfidic conditions, which are
profoundly distinct from most other known deep biosphere environments. The
tantalizing possibility is that we will gain an unprecedented glimpse into
the microbial and organic geochemical processes that are responsible for the
formation of a large portion of the world's hydrocarbon resources, as well
as determining the role of saline groundwater flow in carbonate diagenesis
in continental margin environments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS2">
  <title>The edge of the gyre: biological and oceanographic transitions from the
South Pacific Gyre into the Southern Ocean through the Cenozoic</title>
      <p id="d1e1615">A transect of sites from the South Pacific Gyre into the Southern Ocean will
record a north–south gradient of different biogeochemical and oceanographic
regimes within oxic and suboxic sediments through the Cenozoic.
Microbiological research will help to address questions honed from the
results of IODP Expedition 329 to the South Pacific Gyre. One of its most
southern sites (Site U1371) included a shift from pelagic clay sedimentation
to siliceous accumulation at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 Ma, and the microbial
communities between these two lithological units are unique. Drilling
additional sites on the southernmost edge of the South Pacific Gyre that
focus on acquiring these types of depositional and biogeochemical
transitions will allow the examination of how microbial<?pagebreak page70?> ecosystems are
established and respond to changing environments. This region is critically
underexplored in ocean drilling, and numerous paleoceanographic questions
could also be addressed in this understudied region, although further work
is required to develop specific hypotheses to test.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <title>Consensus statement regarding the critical importance of site
characterization data for IODP scientific drilling proposals</title>
      <p id="d1e1632">The 97 scientists from 12 different countries gathered at the 2017
Australasian IODP Workshop in Sydney, tasked with planning scientific ocean
drilling expeditions in the eastern Indian, southern, and southwestern Pacific
oceans, emphasize the critical importance of geoscientific site
characterization to the future success of IODP and its successors. Site
characterization data, most importantly seismic reflection data, are
essential for the identification of suitable primary and alternate drill
sites in every full drilling proposal submitted to the IODP science support
office, and are subsequently carefully considered by the program's science
evaluation panel (SEP) and the three facility boards.</p>
      <p id="d1e1635">Without this type of information, the scientific exploration of the deep
subseafloor and our understanding of its role in tectonic, climatic,
oceanographic, biological, and geochemical processes in the Earth system
cannot advance. Providing suitably capable vessels for that purpose is
essential for the advancement of scientific ocean drilling as it addresses
ever-evolving global scientific questions, particularly in underexplored
parts of the world ocean like the Australasian region.</p>
      <p id="d1e1638">Accordingly, we emphasize that blue water research vessels with the
necessary seismic reflection systems should continue to be available to
researchers in all IODP member countries under reasonable fiscal conditions,
and with suitable advance (national and international) planning mechanisms.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e1646">No data sets were used in this article.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e1652">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1658">The organizers gratefully acknowledge generous and critically important
funding for participants' travel to the workshop. Funding came from the
Australian and New Zealand IODP Consortium (ANZIC), the US Science Support
Program (USSSP), the Magellan-Plus Workshop Program of the European
Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD), the Japan Drilling Earth
Consortium (J-DESC), the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and
Technology (JAMSTEC), IODP-India, and the home institutions of numerous
scientists. The University of Sydney assisted us in providing facilities for
the workshop.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Jan Behrmann<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: Antony Morris and one anonymous referee</p></ack></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Developing community-based scientific priorities and new drilling proposals in the southern Indian and southwestern Pacific oceans</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>An International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) workshop
was held at Sydney University, Australia, from 13 to 16 June 2017 and was
attended by 97 scientists from 12 countries. The aim of the workshop was to
investigate future drilling opportunities in the eastern Indian Ocean,
southwestern Pacific Ocean, and the Indian and Pacific sectors of the Southern
Ocean. The overlying regional sedimentary strata are underexplored relative
to their Northern Hemisphere counterparts, and thus the role of the Southern
Hemisphere in past global environmental change is poorly constrained. A
total of 23 proposal ideas were discussed, with  ∼ &thinsp;12 of these
deemed mature enough for active proposal development or awaiting scheduled
site survey cruises. Of the remaining 11 proposals, key regions were
identified where fundamental hypotheses are testable by drilling, but either
site surveys are required or hypotheses need further development.
Refinements are anticipated based upon regional IODP drilling in 2017/2018,
analysis of recently collected site survey data, and the development of site
survey proposals. We hope and expect that this workshop will lead to a new
phase of scientific ocean drilling in the Australasian region in the early
2020s.</p></abstract-html>--></article>
