<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \bartext{Science Reports}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Scientific Drilling</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Sci. Dril.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1816-3459</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/sd-25-15-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Understanding volcanic facies in the subsurface: a combined core, wireline
logging and image log data set from the PTA2 and KMA1 boreholes, Big Island,
Hawai`i</article-title><alt-title>Understanding volcanic facies in the subsurface</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Understanding volcanic facies in the subsurface}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{D.~A.~Jerram et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff8">
          <name><surname>Jerram</surname><given-names>Dougal A.</given-names></name>
          <email>dougal@dougalearth.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Millett</surname><given-names>John M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1275-6206</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Kück</surname><given-names>Jochem</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff7">
          <name><surname>Thomas</surname><given-names>Donald</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Planke</surname><given-names>Sverre</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6128-2193</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff7">
          <name><surname>Haskins</surname><given-names>Eric</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Lautze</surname><given-names>Nicole</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Pierdominici</surname><given-names>Simona</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5368-4536</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>CEED, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>DougalEARTH, Solihull, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>VBPR – Volcanic Basin Petroleum Research, Oslo, Norway</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Geology and Petroleum Geology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>University of Hawai`i at Hilo, 200 W. Kāwili St., Hilo, HI 96720-4091, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Hawaii Groundwater and Geothermal Resources Center, University of Hawai`i at Manoa, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> 1680 East West Road, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>a</label><institution>visiting research fellow at: Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Dougal A. Jerram (dougal@dougalearth.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>25</volume>
      <fpage>15</fpage><lpage>33</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>18</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Dougal A. Jerram et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019.html">This article is available from https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e191">To help understand volcanic facies in the subsurface, data sets
that enable detailed comparisons between down-hole geophysical data and cored
volcanic intervals are critical. However, in many cases, the collection of
extended core intervals within volcanic sequences is rare and often
incomplete due to challenging coring conditions. In this contribution we
outline and provide initial results from borehole logging operations within
two fully cored lava-dominated borehole sequences, PTA2 and KMA1, on the Big
Island of Hawai`i. Data for spectral gamma, magnetic susceptibility, dipmeter
resistivity, sonic, total magnetic field, temperature and televiewer wireline
logs were successfully acquired for the open hole interval ca. 889 m to 1567 m within the PTA2 borehole. Spectral gamma was also collected from inside the
casing of both wells, extending the coverage for PTA2 to the surface and
covering the interval from ca. 300 to 1200 m for KMA1. High-quality core
material was available for both boreholes with almost complete recovery which
enabled high-resolution core-to-log integration. Gamma data are generally low
commonly in the range ca. 7–20 gAPI but are shown to increase up to API of
ca. 60 with some intrusions and with increases in hawaiite compositions in
the upper part of PTA2. Velocity data are more variable due to alteration
within porous volcanic facies than with burial depth, with a general degrease
down-hole. The high-resolution televiewer data have been compared directly to
the core, enabling a comprehensive analysis of the variations in the
televiewer responses. This has enabled the identification of key features
including individual vesicles, vesicle segregations, strained vesicles,
chilled margins, rubble zones, intrusive contacts and pāhoehoe lobe
morphologies, which can be confidently matched between the televiewer data
and the full diameter core. The data set and results of this study include
findings which should enable improved borehole facies analysis through
volcanic sequences in the future, especially where down-borehole data and images
but no core are available.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e198"><bold>(a)</bold> Location map of the PTA2 and KMA1 boreholes on a
topographic and bathymetric map of Hawai`i (bathymetric map from USGS, Eakins
et al., 2003). Locations of a selection of
additional cored boreholes drilled on Hawai`i are also indicated (red dots)
(SOH4 1989, 2.0 km; SOH1 1991, 1.7 km; HSDP1 1993, 1.1 km; HSDP2 1999,
3.1 km) (see also Garcia et al., 2007) (MK – Mauna Kea, ML – Mauna Loa, KI
– Kilauea, HU – Hualālai, Ko – Kohala). <bold>(b)</bold> The cored sections
of PTA2 and KMA1 are indicated with their generalized volcanic facies and
well information.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019-f01.png"/>

    </fig>

<?pagebreak page16?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e219">Volcanic rocks (including intrusive and extrusive) occur in a variety of
facies which reflect their composition, mode of emplacement and interaction
with their host environment. The resultant volcanic units in turn comprise
highly variable rock properties. When we examine the subsurface by remote
geophysical tools we see an expression of these associated physical
properties rather than the facies themselves, and where volcanic facies
exist we can often be faced with a number of challenges in interpreting what
we see, or in some cases cannot see. To this extent we can ask the following question:
what are the key volcanic facies, what are their physical properties and how
are these properties spatially distributed? Good onshore analogues provide
an integral method of investigating these rock properties and
heterogeneities in a way to help inform us as to their likely properties in
the subsurface. Subsurface examples where fully cored sections through
volcanic units combined with a comprehensive set of down-borehole remote
data do exist, most notably from scientific drilling; however, examples
where near-complete recovery exists are more limited (Ildefonse et al.,
2007). This is in main part due to the highly variable physical properties
of volcanic rocks and the consequence of these properties on drilling
operations (Teagle et al., 2012; Millett et al., 2016), resulting commonly
in challenging drilling conditions and incomplete core recovery. This is
also compounded by many such drilling operations being conducted offshore,
where ocean conditions make core recovery more challenging still. In
consequence, our general understanding of volcanic facies in the subsurface
is fairly comprehensive, but numerous gaps remain at the detailed level
which require new data to better constrain the relationships between
geophysical observations and formation characteristics.</p>
      <p id="d1e222">Some significant studies do exist that have looked at the nature of volcanic
rocks in the subsurface from borehole data (e.g., Planke, 1994; Helm-Clark et
al., 2004; Bartetzko et al., 2005; Nelson et al., 2009). Perhaps some of the
most significant developments in the interpretation of volcanic rocks from
borehole data have come from the combined Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) and
Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) literature which
records the scientific findings of extensive offshore coring programs
targeting both the oceanic crust and many of the world's volcanic rifted
margins (e.g., Goldberg, 1997; Brewer et al., 1998; Teagle et al., 2012). In
more recent years, offshore exploration for hydrocarbons in many of the
world's rifted margins has also increased the number of data and studies
relating to down-hole measurements through volcanic successions (e.g., Nelson
et al., 2009, 2015; Andersen et al., 2009; Watton et al., 2014a; Millett et
al., 2015; Fornero et al., 2018). In more direct relevance to this study,
findings associated with drilling operations on Hawai`i including the over
3 km deep HSDP2 borehole have also led to significant advances in the
identification and interpretation of volcanic rocks in the subsurface (e.g.,
Katz and Cashman, 2003; Garcia et al., 2007). Despite the many advances in
volcanic borehole analysis, many challenges still remain. These include the
delineation of volcanic intra-facies from remote-sensing data where a full core
is not available along with an associated relative lack of high-quality
petrophysical data for relevant volcanic intra-facies from variable depths
and degrees of alteration. In most instances, the lack of fully cored
intervals within the volcanic units hinders a full assessment of the volcanic
facies present, especially in scenarios where large overlaps in petrophysical
property ranges exist (e.g., Bartetzko et al., 2005; Nelson et al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e225">This contribution presents results from wireline logging operations
undertaken in two fully cored boreholes within the Humu`ula Saddle region
between the Mauna Kea and Mauna Loa volcanoes on the Big Island of Hawai`i
(Fig. 1). The primary aim of this project was to attain high-quality wireline
log data from the boreholes in order to undertake detailed core–log
integrations for the penetrated volcanic facies. The two boreholes, PTA2 and
KMA1, penetrated 1764 and 1528 m of subaerial lava-dominated sequences with
subordinate minor intrusives and sediments respectively, with the entire
sections fully cored. Lava facies include pāhoehoe, `a`ā and
transitional types on a range of scales. The volcanic sequences comprise
basaltic to picritic shield stage lavas of Mauna Kea capped by a thinner
sequence of post-shield basalt-dominated (Hamakua Volcanics) to
hawaiite-dominated (Laupahoehoe Volcanics) lavas (Frey et al., 1990). A wireline
logging data set including spectral gamma, magnetic susceptibility, dipmeter
resistivity, sonic, total magnetic field, temperature and televiewer images
was acquired within the open hole interval ca. 889 to 1567 m of the PTA2
borehole. Additionally spectral gamma was collected from inside the casing of
both wells, extending the coverage for PTA2 up to 0 m depth and covering the
interval from ca. 300 to 1200 m for KMA1. The availability of a good-quality,
near-continuous core for each well, along with the range and types of
encountered volcanic facies, enabled a unique opportunity to improve our
understanding of borehole characterization in volcanic sequences by
comparison of remote data directly with cored intervals. This database, and
in particular the comparison of image log data with core, highlights the
potential for subsurface volcanic facies analysis where core data are not
available.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Background and data acquisition</title>
      <?pagebreak page17?><p id="d1e236">The boreholes investigated within this paper were drilled as part of the
Humu`ula Groundwater Research Project (HGRP), which commenced in 2013,
affiliated with the Hawai`i Groundwater and Geothermal Resources Center
(University of Hawai`i). One borehole (PTA2) was drilled on the Island of
Hawai`i at the Pohakuloa Training Area (PTA) in 2013 and a second (KMA1) was
drilled in 2015 ca. 11 km to the NW (Fig. 1). HGRP's primary scientific
objective was to research and characterize the groundwater resources in
Hawai`i Island's saddle region, which comprises a sequence of entirely
subaerial lava flow with additional minor intrusions and sediments. The US
Army, through the Army Corps of Engineers' Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit
(CESU), provided funding for the drilling and core collection, whereas the US
National Science Foundation provided funding for the initial characterization
and logging of the core. The initial part of this project did not plan for
any geophysical logging data acquisition.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e242">Summary data of lithologies (facies) intersected in hole PTA2.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.98}[.98]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8">PTA2 unit summary (total cored section thickness: 1759.1 m) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unit type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No. of units</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No. of flows or subunits</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Occurrence</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center">Thickness (m) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Percent of section</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">avg. unit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">avg. flow or subunit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pāhoehoe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">228</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1933</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">57.1 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1087.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">61.8 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Transitional</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">123</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">99.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.7 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">`A`ā</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">113</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">211</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">400.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">22.7 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Intrusives</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">66.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.8 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ash</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cinder/scoria</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.8 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.7 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.18 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sandstone</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Conglomerate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.08 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Breccia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.02 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Grand total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">399</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2366</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1759.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total flow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">359</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2267</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">90.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1587.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">90.25 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total nonflow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">171.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.75 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e245">(1) There is one extremely thick laccolith or lopolith at the base of the
Laupahoehoe section that is 29.7 m thick, nearly doubling the overall
thickness of intrusives in the section.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>(2) Cinder/scoria intervals are thought to represent cones or flanks of cones
built from this material during the post-shield stages of Mauna Kea's growth
(alternating with <?xmltex \hack{\\}?>pāhoehoe of constant lithology in the deeper cases; see
stratigraphic column).<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>(3) Potential ash and soil intervals are currently being interpreted by Dr.
Nicole Lautze; the number of these units may increase based on these
interpretations.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>(4) While most of the conglomerate units are interpreted as fluvial or
colluvial, the uppermost (recovered in the first run of drilling) is thought
to be glacial in origin.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e701">Discussions with Donald Thomas and Nicole Lautze (the principle project
leaders) and Eric Haskins (core archive manager), from the University of
Hawai`i, were initially sparked from scientific exchanges at the American
Geophysical Union (AGU) 2013 meeting in San Francisco,
USA. These exchanges identified the cored data set as a potentially
valuable resource for further analysis. The idea of generating a complete
core-to-remote-sensing suite for these wells was then further explored by
Dougal Jerram (DougalEARTH Ltd. and University of Oslo), Sverre Planke (VBPR
and University of Oslo) and John Millett (VBPR and University of Aberdeen)
along with Donald Thomas. Funding for geophysical logging of the two
boreholes was proposed and provided by the VMAPP (Volcanic Margin Petroleum
Prospectivity) project (VBPR, DougalEARTH, and TGS) as part of the research
module program. The aim was to generate one of the most complete data sets of
fully cored volcanics with associated borehole measurements, to aid in our
understanding of volcanic facies in the subsurface. The Operational Support
Group (OSG) of ICDP (International Continental Scientific Drilling Program)
at the GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences in Potsdam (Germany) was
then approached to undertake the logging. The logging project reported here
was formed from a collaboration between VMAPP, the University of Hawai`i and
OSG. Through this collaboration, the<?pagebreak page18?> project gained full access to the core
material enabling the unique opportunity of undertaking detailed core–log
integration from a thick sequence of heterogeneous lava facies in order to
improve our understanding of the geophysical response of these facies under
differing subsurface regimes.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Borehole coring operations</title>
      <p id="d1e712">The overall purpose of the project was an effort to better define hydrologic
conditions in the central region of Hawaii Island. The prevailing hydrologic
model for Hawaii is one of a relatively thin basal freshwater lens underlain
by saltwater-saturated rocks below (e.g. Thomas et al., 1996). The findings
of the Hawai`i Scientific Drilling Project (HSDP) for freshwater-saturated
rocks at depths of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km below sea level near the Hawaii Island
shoreline suggested that much more substantial freshwater resources were
present within the interior of the island (Stolper et al., 2009). Surface
resistivity surveys (Pierce and Thomas, 2009) identified subsurface
conductive features that were consistent with high-elevation groundwater and
two sites were selected for deep test holes. In light of the near absence of
detailed stratigraphic data for the interior of Hawai`i Island, diamond
wireline core drilling was selected as a means of both defining the elevation
of the water table and recovering information on the stratigraphic features
associated with high-elevation groundwater in the area.</p>
      <p id="d1e725">The drilling approach was to install shallow, large-diameter conductor
casing, core to a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m with PQ (122 mm diameter) coring
tolls, open the hole with rotary tools and set surface (177 mm) casing to
that depth, continue drilling with PQ to stable formations at one-third to
one-half of the target depth, set (114 mm) casing to that depth, and
continue to total depth (TD) with HQ (96 mm) coring tools. The PTA2 borehole
was cored to a depth of 889 m (top of casing at 1943 m) with PQ tools and
to at total depth of 1764 m with HQ tools. The KMA1 test hole was drilled to
a depth of 298 m with PQ tools and to TD of 1531 m with HQ. Core recovery
for the PTA2 hole averaged for the entire depth was about 97 %; core
recovery for the KMA1 hole over the entire depth was about 91 %. A summary of the lithology of the
cores from the PTA2 and KMA1 holes is presented in tabular form (see Tables 1 and 2).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e741">Summary data of lithologies (facies) intersected in hole
KMA1.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.97}[.97]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8">KMA1 unit summary (total cored section thickness: 1522.2 m) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unit type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No. of units</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No. of flows or subunits</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Occurrence</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center">Thickness (m) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Percent of section</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">avg. unit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">avg. flow or subunit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pāhoehoe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">418</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">409.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">26.90 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Transitional</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">120</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.1 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">239.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">15.75 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">`A`ā</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">168</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">236</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">51.9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">819.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">53.85 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Intrusives</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.19 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ash/soil/sand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.07 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Breccia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.24 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Grand total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">324</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">792</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1522.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total flow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">315</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">774</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">97.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1469.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">96.5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total nonflow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.8 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">53.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1077">More information about the project along with a complete photographic archive
of the two borehole cores is available at the HGRP website
(<uri>https://www.higp.hawaii.edu/hggrc/projects/humuula-groundwater-research-project/</uri>,
last access: 2 February 2019). No geophysical logging data acquisition was
planned as part of the HGRP project.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1086">Summary of all logging runs from the project.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sonde run</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Logging speed (m min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Logged interval (m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Borehole</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Logging trip</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TS1-SGR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15/02/2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 to 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">313–1204</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">KMA1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TS1-SGR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17/02/2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 to 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0–808</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PTA2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TS1-SGR-MS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15/06/2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">742–1567</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PTA2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TS1-BS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16/06/2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6 to 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">885–1567</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PTA2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TS1-DIP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16/06/2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6 to 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">908–1567</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PTA2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ABI43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17/06/2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">886–1567</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PTA2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Logging operations</title>
      <p id="d1e1288">The initial logging project outline involved a single logging operation
planned for December 2015 during which time logging of the open hole sections
of both PTA2 and KMA1 was scheduled. Sonic, resistivity, spectral gamma,
dipmeter, magnetic susceptibility, temperature, total magnetic field and
televiewer tool logging were planned for both wells in order<?pagebreak page19?> to allow
detailed volcanic facies assessment and to test correlations between the two
boreholes. Neutron and density tools have also been demonstrated to give
important insights into volcanic facies (e.g., Planke, 1994; Shervais et al.,
2013); however, due to the active radioactive sources in both tools, it was
not possible to include these logs in the logging suite on Hawaii due to
operational restrictions. In the end two logging trips were undertaken, the
first in February 2016 and the second in June 2016, and only the open hole
section of PTA2 was logged due to major complications associated with the
final stages of drilling within KMA1 and subsequent efforts to resolve the
resulting stuck pipe problem. In Fig. 2 selected photographs of the site and
operations are presented.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1293"><bold>(a)</bold> Drill truck at the KMA1 site. <bold>(b)</bold> Spectral gamma
logging within casing at PTA2. <bold>(c)</bold> Jochem Kück and Marco Groh
(GFZ) with the sonic sonde at PTA2. <bold>(d)</bold> Borehole televiewer sonde
being lowered into the borehole at PTA2. <bold>(e)</bold> Eric Haskins cuts
sections of core for additional sampling.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1316">The slim hole wireline logging tools deployed during the logging operations
were made by Antares, Germany, except for the acoustic televiewer ABI43, made
by ALT, Luxembourg. All tool combinations included a natural total gamma ray (GR)
measurement for depth correlation except for the ABI43. Logging was
undertaken using a Comprobe electric winch with a Rochester 3/16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, four-conductor cable provided by HGRP. The depth reference for all logging runs
was ground level at ca. 1943 m above sea level (based on GPS elevation
determination). Details of all the combined logging runs, logging speeds and
measured intervals are given in Table 3.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Wireline log and televiewer processing</title>
      <p id="d1e1339">All borehole data were screened and processed by GFZ prior to
interpretation. Depth corrections were applied to all logs primarily by
gamma peak matching other than for the ABI43 which does not contain a gamma
sensor. For depth correlation of the ABI43 logs the caliper data from the
DIP meter proved useful in comparison with the televiewer travel time and
amplitudes which are also highly sensitive to borehole size. The accuracy of
this caliper match is even better than that of the GR match. Due to the very
low total gamma response of the open hole section, the individual spectral
gamma results for K, Th and U have been deemed below quantitative spectrum
values and therefore only the total gamma is presented for this interval.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1344">Example of the exceptional core recovery from the wells (further
examples can be seen in Figs. 9 and 10).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1353">The raw sonic waveform data were processed using a combination of first
arrival trace picking for P and S waves along with additional semblance
analysis. In general, the P-wave picking was straight forward for most of the
borehole; however, a strong direct wave interferes with the P-wave first
arrival at lower velocities in the near receiver (Fig. 4), making accurate
picking challenging. The S-wave arrival also becomes highly unclear in the
upper part of the well above ca. 1100 m. Velocity data for the open hole
section of PTA2 are therefore of mixed quality with generally improved
confidence levels towards the base of the well.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1359">Example of raw borehole sonic waveform data analysis from PTA2.
Near- and far-receiver traces (50 cm spacing) with first arrival picking (FAP) results.
The derived velocities are shown on the right side together with results from a separate semblance analysis (SA). The
light-blue curve is the measured water wave velocity, and total GR is shown for
depth correlation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page20?><p id="d1e1368">The televiewer data from PTA2 were acquired at the highest resolution and
optimized logging speed to ensure the highest possible data quality. For both
travel time and amplitude, static and dynamic (10 cm vertical window)
normalizations were applied to improve imaging (Fig. 5). Each channel (raw,
static, dynamic) for travel time and amplitude in particular displays minor
to major differences in the resulting images depending on the scale and
variations between different intervals and features. All output logs are
displayed with a logarithmic scale with the ranges optimized for clarity
(Fig. 5). Breakouts are very common in some intervals of the wellbore (e.g.,
ca. 1223.5 and ca. 1352 m). Examples of both key seat and breakouts are
present. The correlation between sonic Vp and the televiewer amplitude data
is variable, with some intervals showing clear associations (e.g., Fig. 5c)
while in other examples the expected relationships are not apparent.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1373"><bold>(a)</bold> Simplified schematic displaying the four-arm caliper
response to common borehole conditions (following Reinecker et al., 2003).
<bold>(b)</bold> Basics of televiewer imaging of borehole features.
<bold>(c)</bold> Example of some of these features from the PTA2 borehole
televiewer data.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page21?><p id="d1e1390">In summary, the logging data derived from the PTA2 borehole includes very
high-quality data for the majority of the open hole logged sequence, and the
separate log traces have been confidently depth matched. Accurate comparison
between the borehole core and the inter-relationships of the geophysical
properties can therefore be undertaken with similar confidence.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Wireline logging results</title>
      <p id="d1e1403">Within this section, results from the borehole logging are presented. The log
data for the main open hole logged section are summarized in Fig. 6 along
with a summary of the volcanic facies based on the core logging (Thomas and
Haskins, 2013). Data from each sonde are described individually in relation
to the volcanic stratigraphy in the following section. Unless otherwise
stated, the presented logs display data with a 3 m running average applied
to reduce data noise.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1408">Summary of the full borehole logging results for PTA2.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Caliper</title>
      <p id="d1e1424">The four-arm caliper sonde gives information on borehole diameter and shape. The
caliper results from the open hole section of PTA2 display a generally good
hole condition with a uniform diameter of ca. 98 mm (HQ core bit outer
diameter ca. 96 mm) for the majority of the logged section (Fig. 6). Semi-continuous breakouts occur through large intervals of the borehole associated
with the in situ stress field (breakouts parallel to minimum horizontal
stress). These breakouts are often best developed within the most coherent
and stiff facies, e.g., `a`ā interiors and intrusions, and are being
investigated in ongoing research relating to the in situ stress regime of the
Mauna Kea volcano.</p>
      <p id="d1e1427">The borehole diameter only exceeds 20 mm off-gauge in eight separate
intervals, and, in a number of these cases, only one of the two caliper arm
pairs exceed this deviation from the baseline indicative of an irregular
borehole shape (e.g., key seat). Wider diameters occur over the full range of
major facies within the borehole (Fig. 6); however, correlation between these
and facies within some intervals is also observed. Most notably, in the upper
ca. 300 m of the logged interval, the largest washouts occur dominantly
either within `a`ā and transitional facies or at the transitions between
these and pāhoehoe-dominated sequences. Washouts are also closely
associated with minor intrusions leading up to ca. 1100 m. These
observations appear consistent with the generally rubbly loose nature of
`a`ā and, to a lesser degree, transitional<?pagebreak page22?> lava flow margins which would
be expected to cave most easily (Millett et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e1430">Fractures associated with intrusions along with the baking effect that they
have on host rocks are also commonly associated with borehole breakouts in
volcanic boreholes and therefore the caliper response in the upper part of
the well is largely as expected. The largest washouts in the borehole occur
in the lower part of the well, e.g., at ca. 1350, 1450 and 1520 m. These
examples are less facies constrained, with two occurring largely within
pāhoehoe sequences and, therefore, fracturing and/or alteration, known to
be more pervasive within the lower borehole intervals, may have contributed
to borehole instability in these cases.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Gamma</title>
      <p id="d1e1442">Gamma log responses are related to the abundance of the radioactive large
ion lithophile elements K, U and Th in the measured rock volume. In volcanic
rocks, the abundance of these elements is related to the primary magma
composition that produced the resulting volcanic facies. In general,
basaltic igneous rocks have very low abundances of the K, U and Th,
especially in tholeiitic low K melts. Due to the general incompatibility of
these elements during early fractional crystallization of basaltic melts,
their abundance and therefore related API gamma responses increase with
fractional crystallization and differentiation. Gamma ray responses can
therefore be a good proxy for the degree of differentiation<?pagebreak page23?> in volcanic rock
suites (Stefansson et al., 2000; Delpino and Bermúdez, 2009), with
higher gamma responses indicating more evolved compositions. Alteration and
weathering processes are also known to affect gamma responses in basaltic
rocks largely due to the water solubility and therefore mobility of K during
alteration (e.g., Planke, 1994). In basaltic rocks, weathering at flow tops
generally causes an increase in the gamma response above background levels
within flow interiors (e.g., Planke, 1994).</p>
      <p id="d1e1445">The gamma response for the PTA2 borehole is generally very low with the
majority of the well, displaying relatively uniform API counts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Intervals with high API counts do occur in the upper part of the
borehole but are restricted to depths shallower than ca. 700 m (Fig. 7) and
increase in frequency and extent upwards over this depth interval.
Interestingly, the highest gamma intervals, which reach up to API of ca. 60,
are almost exclusively associated with intrusions identified from the core
logging. A number of lava flows within the upper section of the well also
show elevated API when compared to similar lava facies at greater depth. It
is noted from the core descriptions of PTA2 that hawaiite compositions become
more common towards the top of the sequence, associated with the post-shield
pāhoehoe lavas, in addition to the multiple fine-grained minor intrusions
identified within these sections (e.g., Fig. 7). Hawaiite comprises a more
evolved melt than basalt and therefore is expected to contain larger
percentages of incompatible elements such as K, U and Th, resulting in
increased gamma response.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1460">Gamma ray log results compared to volcanic facies in the PTA2 and
KMA1 boreholes <bold>(a, d)</bold>. Two panels in the center display key
intervals from PTA2 at a larger scale <bold>(b, c)</bold>. Black lines display
flow boundaries within pāhoehoe packages in the bottom middle panel.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019-f07.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1476">Within the lower part of the well, gamma variations are far more restricted
with values generally within the range ca. 7–20 API. In Fig. 7c, an expanded
example from the interval ca. 1450–1550 m is presented. It is clear that
systematic variations in gamma response are also exhibited within this
lava-dominated sequence. Flow margins are highlighted for clarity and it is seen
that inflections in the gamma peaks and troughs are readily associated with
flow margins. Flow margins are not, however, always associated with increases
in gamma response and therefore a combination of resolution, alteration and
subtle base-level compositional differences<?pagebreak page24?> between the flows of the lower
sequence are the cause of the gamma variations.</p>
      <p id="d1e1479">The results for KMA1, collected from within the HQ drill string during the
time it was stuck, are also presented in Fig. 7d alongside the detailed core-based stratigraphy. Very little variation is observed within the gamma
response for the logged interval of KMA1. The high gamma peaks observed in
the upper parts of PTA2 are not observed within the sampled interval;
however, the data do not cover the upper 300 m in KMA1. It could therefore
be that higher gamma compositions are also present within this upper sequence
of KMA1; however, the lack of any intrusions in this sequence (which hosted
the majority of the higher gamma intervals in PTA2) may suggest that they are
not present at KMA1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Magnetic susceptibility (MSUS) and total magnetic field (MagTot)</title>
      <p id="d1e1490">Basaltic rocks have the potential to record strong magnetic signatures due
to the common presence of accessory iron and iron–titanium oxide minerals
such as magnetite, spinel and ilmenite. The remnant magnetic response of
basaltic rocks is determined by a combination of the presence, type and
abundance of these Fe–Ti oxides in addition to crystal size and alteration
(e.g., Planke et al., 1999). Magnetic susceptibility measures the ability of
a rock formation to become magnetized in response to an applied magnetic
field and in its simplest application gives inference to the abundance of
ferromagnetic magnetic minerals within the tested rock volume. Magnetic
susceptibility in basaltic rocks is therefore affected by much the same
parameters as the total magnetic field.</p>
      <?pagebreak page25?><p id="d1e1493">Magnetic susceptibility within the open hole section of PTA2 is dominantly
within the range of ca. 100–350 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> SI units while the total magnetic
field displays values dominantly around the ca. 35 000 nT mark with a small
number of excursions reaching higher values of maximum ca. 40 000 nT and
some lower values down to ca. 32 100 nT in the upper part of the logged
interval. The two highest peaks in total magnetic field are broadly
associated with intrusions at ca. 1100 m, both of which also display
elevated susceptibilities (Fig. 6). In some other cases intrusions display
clearly elevated values; however, in others, no observable increase from
background is seen. No clear and general relationship is observed between
MSUS and MagTot; in some cases they appear linked, in others they appear
independent. Magnetic susceptibility shows a significant level of systematic
variations associated with lava facies flow packages and boundaries. The response is not uniform in nature but,
in many instances, a sharp reduction or increase in susceptibility
can be seen at or in other cases immediately prior to the facies boundaries (e.g., Fig. 6).
Planke et al. (1999) demonstrated that flow top
alteration can cause a kick in susceptibility values at the transition from
lava interiors up into the crust and at least in some instances; this feature
appears to be replicated in the PTA2 lavas.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page26?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>DIP meter</title>
      <p id="d1e1516">The DIP meter records resistivity data but is uncalibrated and therefore it
may be used to qualitatively assess relative resistivity of the formation.
With the lack of laterolog resistivity data this comprises the best available
inference for the PTA2 borehole. Figure 6 displays the DIP meter resistivity
for the PTA2 borehole plotted against the other wireline data. The most
striking feature of the resistivity data is a large step shift to higher
average values at ca. 1130 m. Above and below this transition the variations
are quite scattered with an irregular serrated character but importantly
there is almost no overlap in the absolute ranges within these two sections.</p>
      <p id="d1e1519">Geologically there is not a sufficient change in the penetrated facies which
could account for this change in the resistivity range. Alteration is known
to increase within the lower interval which could potentially explain some of
the increased resistivity where pores are filled with secondary minerals, but
cannot explain the sharp transition. Interestingly, the jump in resistivity
corresponds to a depth at which very slow drilling conditions were
encountered that were associated with a particular type of secondary mineral
products (zeolites). The secondary minerals formed a thick film on the
bit face that the diamond chips on the standard bit were not able to
penetrate through; after a change in the bit to larger diamonds this issue
was overcome. This is still problematic to explain the base-level shift as
the lava cores within each section should show broadly similar values.
Another more likely possibility is that it is associated with the borehole
fluids. A range of mud additives were added to the drilling fluid during
clearing of the borehole ca. 2 months prior to the logging operations and,
therefore, it could be that density stratification may have occurred and that
the heavier muds in the lower section have a higher resistivity than fresh
formation water above.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e1524"><bold>(a)</bold> Vp and Vs data from the PTA2 sonic log plotted against
the volcanic lithofacies. <bold>(b, c)</bold> Zoomed-in logs which both display
data with a 1 m running average applied; black lines indicating flow and
contact boundaries between similar facies. Ol rich stands for olivine
rich.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1539">A number of aquifer feed points are known from within the upper part of the
well (Thomas and Haskins, 2013) and therefore circulation of aquifer waters
into the borehole may have added to this effect. An inflection to a higher
temperature gradient ca. 100 m deeper than the step in resistivity also
points to different fluid regimes within the borehole and could support some
sort of fluid stratification. More work is required to constrain this
further.</p>
      <p id="d1e1542">Although there is some correlation between the volcanic stratigraphy and the
resistivity (Fig. 6), the relationship is not consistently related to the
primary volcanic facies. Resistivity usually decreases at lava flow
boundaries due to increases in vesicles, alteration and fracturing (Planke,
1994; Nelson et al., 2009). This is observed at some flow margins but not at
others. Dense intrusion interiors and non-vesicular lava flow interiors are
expected to display high resistivity, which is observed in some cases, e.g.,
the intrusions at ca. 1050–1110, but not in other cases, e.g., ca. 1480 m.
Extensive fracturing may explain some of these deviations; however, some
concerns regarding the consistency and accuracy of the data remain due these
poor correlation examples along with the poorly understood jump in values
described above.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Sonic</title>
      <p id="d1e1553">Velocity data from the sonic log has historically proven to provide some of
the most instructive information for the interpretation of volcanic rocks in
the subsurface (Planke, 1994). This is because different volcanic facies
show a very wide range of velocity but also display distinctive distributions
of velocity (e.g., Nelson et al., 2009), which can be tied back to volcanic
facies at a variety of scales. P-wave (Vp) and S-wave (Vs) results from the
picked and processed sonic log data are presented in Fig. 8. P-wave velocity
data for the borehole give robust data, whereas picking for S waves was
significantly more challenging and therefore gave lower confidence results in
the upper part of the sequence. The average Vp for the logged interval is
ca. 4.4 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> while the average Vs is ca. 2.35 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. There
is a generally good correlation between dense crystalline core material
associated with sheet intrusions and `a`ā lava cores and high Vp
signatures in some cases exceeding 6 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Exceptions do occur where
high Vp is associated with pāhoehoe lavas with no obvious evidence for
denser-than-normal cores and in these cases (e.g., at ca. 1045 m) the higher
densities may be related to a combination of denser (high Vp) phenocrysts
phases (e.g., olivine) and significantly denser (Mg rich) basic magmas (Watton
et al., 2014b).</p>
      <p id="d1e1592">The largest variations observed within the sequence occur within the zone
ca. 950–1150 m in which the greatest diversity of volcanic facies exists.
Low peak velocities down to ca. 4 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, within the lower part of the
well, are associated with dominantly compound-braided pāhoehoe facies
(e.g., Jerram, 2002; Nelson et al., 2009). The low velocity is associated with
the facies which display generally high levels of vesicularity and porosity along
with increased levels of alteration with burial. It is also clear that
background velocity values appear to be more affected by alteration than
they are by the increase in burial compaction stresses. This is explicable by
the fact that fresh basalt at ambient pressure can commonly exceed velocities
of 5 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> due to its hard interlocking crystal structure, and, due
the strength within this structure, even moderately vesicular basalts show
little reduction in porosity (and hence velocity) with burial effects alone
(Millett et al., 2016). At the same time, alteration (where pervasive) can
reduce the velocity of basalt by up to 2 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, at
relatively shallow burial depths, average velocity can clearly reduce with
depth in association with facies that are susceptible to alteration as is the
case for the porous pāhoehoe-dominated lava sequence. Clear correspondence
between Vp and Vs is visible for some intervals of the well (e.g., Fig. 8);
however, in other intervals, no or limited correspondence exists. The
Vp <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Vs ratio for the entire well is ca. 1.88, whereas for the interval
at the bottom of the well where good correspondence exists it is slightly<?pagebreak page27?> lower
at ca. 1.79. Both values are within the same range as for older lava
sequences, e.g., from eastern Greenland (Planke and Cambray, 1998); however, they
are slightly higher than the average of 1.69 recorded from laboratory
measurements on Hawaiian compositions (e.g., Manghnani and Woollard, 1968). As
discussed in the processing section, the confidence in the S-wave picking in
the upper part of the borehole is reduced. It is interesting to note that the
S-wave data become challenging to pick at a very similar depth to that which
the resistivity data displays a large jump in base level. It could therefore
be that something relating to the fluid properties within the upper part of
the open hole section also affected the sonic log data, although this also
requires additional investigation beyond the scope of this report.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page28?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Televiewer</title>
      <p id="d1e1646">The televiewer tool collects high-resolution velocity data (amplitude and
travel time) for the full circumference of the borehole which is processed to
give a continuous acoustic image of the borehole surface (Zemaneck et al.,
1969). The televiewer is most commonly utilized for structural and stress
field analysis (e.g., Zoback et al., 1985; Ziegler et al., 2016; Millett et
al., 2018); however, the images may also give potentially important
information about volcanic facies and intra-facies. The ability for image
logs to characterize volcanic facies elements has been highlighted for the
FMS and FMI logs (resistivity imaging, Brewer et al., 1998; Tominaga, 2013;
Watton et al., 2014a; Fornero et al., 2018); however, similar dedicated
studies for the interpretation of volcanic facies from the televiewer appear
somewhat limited and of lower apparent image quality to date (e.g., Massiot
et al., 2015). Acquisition of high-quality televiewer data formed one of the
primary objectives of the Hawai`i borehole operations.</p>
      <p id="d1e1649">In general, the image quality from the PTA2 borehole is very good, with many
intervals displaying exceptional feature clarity while in a few intervals
image quality is reduced and acquisition artefacts obscure the images. The
key objective for collecting high-resolution image data was to test the
ability of the televiewer to capture detailed volcanic intra-facies remotely,
which is made possible by the availability of continuous core data. A full core
is rarely available for volcanic wells, even for scientific drilling (e.g.,
Brewer et al., 1998), whereas for petroleum exploration wells, only very
small core sections are commonly taken but these rarely intersect volcanic
intervals. Throughout the logged interval, there is a depth discrepancy
whereby the televiewer depths are generally ca. 1.6 m deeper than the core
depth values. Additional to this correction, in many cases the resulting
boxed core material from individual core pipe runs (ca. 10 ft) may exceed or
not equate exactly to the known penetration. This is simply due to the fact
that the core is sometimes broken and fragmented and therefore does not fit
perfectly back together, resulting in longer recorded lengths compared to the
known penetration. The depth is reset at the start of each core run and
therefore only minor errors (generally &lt; 30 cm) may be encountered
at the bottom of some runs.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e1654"><bold>(a)</bold> Example of a simple pāhoehoe lobe from PTA2
displaying characteristic vesicle size distribution clearly imaged from the
televiewer amplitude data along with flow top fractures. <bold>(b)</bold> Detail
of a baked `a`ā flow margin breccia from PTA2. Note the detail at the
flow margins is clearer from the televiewer data due to the crumbly nature of
the contact rubble. In each image, letters (a, b, etc.) highlight linked
features on both the core and the image log.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019-f09.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e1671">Examples of pāhoehoe and `a`ā facies: <bold>(a)</bold> from
eruption and outcrop, <bold>(b)</bold> as imaged in televiewer, and
<bold>(c)</bold> examples from the cored section.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/25/15/2019/sd-25-15-2019-f10.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1689">To highlight the potential of televiewer images for volcanic facies
delineation, in Fig. 9, type examples of pāhoehoe and `a`ā lava
facies are presented and compared to observations from core. In Fig. 9a, an
individual simple pāhoehoe lava lobe is characterized by clear vesicle
size and abundance variations with dense small vesicles at the lower and
upper vesicle zones (LVZ and UVZ following Katz and Cashman, 2003), transitioning
into fewer larger vesicles within the central portion of the flow interior.
Large vesicles within the central portion of the flow lobe can be clearly
seen within the televiewer amplitude data along with subparallel vesicle
coalescence bands within the UVZ to flow top transition. As is typical of
pāhoehoe lavas, the altered flow top crust is thicker than the flow base
and has also been baked by the overlying flow increasing the degree of
alteration. This is also observed on the televiewer data, with a broader band
of lower amplitudes at the top of the flow. Flow top fractures which
terminate within the flow core are also clearly observed from the televiewer
amplitude data, which importantly suggests that the corresponding fractures in
the core are primary and not drilling induced. Along compound pāhoehoe
lava sections within the data, multiple thin lava lobes and pāhoehoe
“toes” in addition to internal boundaries delineated by vesicle bands and
chilled margins can be seen which would have formed during emplacement.
Chilled margins are generally highly altered to clay or palagonite and
dominantly display clear low-amplitude boundaries. Spherical-to-sub-spherical
features are identified from the televiewer where these chilled margins or
internal densely vesicular bands intersect the borehole at a toe termination
or margin. Spongy pāhoehoe flow cores or lobe and toe cores display very low
amplitudes due to a very low proportion of lava (vesicle walls) compared to
open space where porosities commonly exceed 50 % (e.g., Walker, 1989).</p>
      <p id="d1e1692">`A`ā lavas comprise the other major lava flow type found on Hawai`i and
in basaltic lava provinces in general. They are characterized by rubbly and
brecciated upper and lower margins due to auto-brecciation of the lava flow
crust during emplacement. In Fig. 9b an example of an `a`ā rubbly flow
margin is presented. The flow margin breccia belongs to the underlying flow
interior and has been baked and oxidized by the overlying lava flow. The
breccia displays a very clear and characteristic fabric comprising
high-amplitude clasts within a low-amplitude finer-grained matrix. In other
examples clear straining of regions showing different vesicle densities is
observed within the flow core, a common feature of `a`ā lavas where the
lava continues to move during cooling and vesiculation causing deformation of
the developing vesicular fabric (Cas and Wright, 1988). These sharp
boundaries between the zones of different vesicle densities are clearly
represented on the televiewer amplitude data along with examples of larger
deformed vesicles near flow bases. Vesicle segregations and entrained clinker
are also potentially visible as patches of low amplitude which match the core
well in a number of examples. Recovery can commonly be poor within `a`ā
lavas due to heavy fracturing and the presence of loose rubble and,
therefore, identifying flow features remotely (e.g., televiewer) may prove
invaluable in understanding the volcanic sequence where such core gaps occur.</p>
      <p id="d1e1695">Many other detailed facies and intra-facies features including transitional
lavas, sedimentary units, ash layers and intricate intrusive units have been
investigated in detail from the Hawai`i boreholes and will form the basis of
a standalone study presented elsewhere.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page30?><sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Closing remarks and future outlook</title>
      <p id="d1e1707">This paper presents results from new borehole wireline logging and image
logging of two fully cored boreholes on the Big Island of Hawai`i. Through
this project an important database of down-borehole petrophysical variations
has been collected, which can be interpreted in full due to the exceptional
core data available over a large interval of the PTA2 borehole. Such data
are often hard to realize in many offshore areas that drill through volcanic
successions due to the costs alongside the volcanic intervals often not
forming reservoir targets. Additionally the data set provides a valuable
resource to look at average flow thickness, number of flow units and flows,
and volcanic facies structure.</p>
      <p id="d1e1710">Gamma data are typically low as expected for basalts with variations
occurring where intrusions come in and with an increase due to more evolved
hawaiite compositions. Within the magnetic data, the two highest peaks in
total magnetic field are broadly associated with intrusions at ca. 1100 m,
yet other intrusions and the relation of the magnetic data to the varying
volcanic facies show mixed results. Alteration at flow tops can show kicks
in the susceptibility, which has been demonstrated to be the case in other
lava successions (e.g., Planke et al., 1999). Resistivity data from DIP meter
records show some correlation to volcanic facies in some areas but not in
others, which could be due to a number of factors (e.g., variations in
fracturing, lack of calibration of DIP meter readings). Such data could be
improved with better constrained laterolog resistivity data. Variations
within the velocity with depth are clearly influenced by alteration of the
porous lavas and associated facies, with a noted degrease in velocity in the
lower part of the well. The caliper results highlight semi-continuous
breakouts occurring down the wells, best developed in the most coherent
facies (e.g., `a`ā interiors and intrusions), which are associated with
the in situ stress field (breakouts occur parallel to minimum horizontal
stress). The directions of these breakouts can be of use in unraveling the
in situ stress regime of the Mauna Kea volcano and as such are forming the
basis of ongoing research.</p>
      <p id="d1e1713">The televiewer borehole imaging sonde, as an example, can produce highly
informative data for delineating small-scale volcanic features and
intra-facies when optimized settings are used. Features including individual
vesicles, vesicle segregations, strained vesicles, chilled margins, rubble
zones, intrusive contacts and pāhoehoe lobe morphologies can be
confidently matched between the televiewer data and the full<?pagebreak page31?> diameter core.
One of our main goals in undertaking such a study is the potential ability to
link facies with analogue examples and ultimately get back to the geological
processes that have formed the petrophysical variations preserved in the
rocks. Figure 10 acts as a summary of this concept by linking back our
down-borehole observations to the key volcanic facies that formed them. Going
forward, data sets like the one presented here allow improved confidence in
the interpretation of borehole imaging through volcanic sequences where core
is not available. Ongoing and future work will focus on the detail within the
data set to fully explore the key volcanological, structural and geophysical
inferences that can be gained from this case example.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e1720">A digital archive of core photos and detailed core run
depth log information is available at
<uri>https://www.higp.hawaii.edu/hggrc/projects/humuula-groundwater-research-project/</uri>
(HGGRS, 2019).
The down-hole data are published with a digital object identifier via GFZ Data Services (Kück, 2019).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e1729">The manuscript was prepared by DAJ and JMM, with additional contributions and edits
by all members of the author list. The project started with initial
discussions between DougalEARTH (DAJ) and Hawaii (NL, DT), at the fall AGU
meeting in San Francisco in 2013. A program of acquisition was agreed to by
VBPR/DougalEARTH (DAJ, SP), GFZ Potsdam (JK) and Hawaii (DT). DAJ and SP
visited the site and the core data set with Haskins and Thomas in
December 2015 for project planning. Data acquisition was undertaken on site
in February and June 2016 (JMM, JK, EH and DT). Once acquired, Pierdominici
carried out additional work on the televiewer data.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e1735">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1741">This project was made possible by the collaborative outlook of the main
partners (VBPR and DougalEARTH, GFZ, and the University of Hawai`i) and the
extensive background work undertaken by the researchers at the Hawai`i
Groundwater and Geothermal Resources Center (University of Hawai`i) and from
the HGRP project. Jehanne Paris is thanked for helping organize the logging
operations and helping in the field. Martin Töpfer and Marco Groh
(Operational Support Group, OSG, of ICDP, GFZ) are thanked for ensuring the smooth
running of the logging operations. Dougal Jerram and Sverre Planke are also
supported by the Research Council of Norway, through its Centres of
Excellence funding scheme, project 223272 at CEED, University of Oslo. We
would like to thank Breno Waichel and John Shervais for constructive reviews
and the editorial team at Scientific Drilling for their prompt handling and
meticulous guidance through the various stages from submission to
publication.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Tomoaki
Morishita<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: Breno Waichel and John Shervais</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andersen, M. S., Boldreel, L. O., and Seifaba Group: Log responses in basalt
successions in 8 wells from the Faroe-Shetland Channel – a classification
scheme for interpretation of geophysical logs and case studies. Faroe Islands
Exploration Conference: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference, Annales Societatis
Scientiarum Færoensis, Supplementum, 50, 364–391, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bartetzko, A., Delius, H., and Pechnig, R.: Effect of compositional and
structural variations on log responses of igneous and metamorphic rocks. I:
mafic rocks, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 240, 255–278,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.240.01.19" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.240.01.19</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Brewer, T. S., Harvey, P. K., Lovell, M. A., Haggas, S., Williamson, G., and
Pezard, P.: Ocean floor volcanism: constraints from the integration of core
and downhole logging measurements, Geological Society, London, Special
Publications, 136, 341–362, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.136.01.28" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.136.01.28</ext-link>,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Cas, R. A. F. and Wright, J. V.: Lava flows. In Volcanic Successions Modern
and Ancient, 58–91, Springer Netherlands, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Delpino, D. H. and Bermúdez, A. M.: Petroleum systems including
unconventional reservoirs in intrusive igneous rocks (sills and laccoliths),
The Leading Edge, 28, 804–811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3167782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.3167782</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Eakins, B. W., Robinson, J. E., Kanamatsu, T., Naka, J., Smith, J. R.,
Takahashi, E., and Clague, D. A.: Hawaii's volcanoes revealed: U.S.
Geological Survey Geologic Investigations Series Map I-2809, 1 plate,
<uri>https://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/2809/</uri> (last access: 2 February 2019), 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Fornero, S. A., Marins, G. M., Lobo, J. T., Freire, A. F. M., and de Lima, E.
F.: Characterization of subaerial volcanic facies using acoustic image logs:
Lithofacies and log-facies of a lava-flow deposit in the Brazilian pre-salt,
deepwater of Santos Basin, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 99, 156–174,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.09.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.09.029</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Frey, F. A., Wise, W. S., Garcia, M. O., West, H., Kwon, S. T., and Kennedy,
A.: Evolution of Mauna Kea Volcano, Hawaii: Petrologic and geochemical
constraints on postshield volcanism, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 95,
1271–1300, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB095iB02p01271" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB095iB02p01271</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Garcia, M. O., Haskins, E. H., Stolper, E. M., and Baker, M.: Stratigraphy of
the Hawai'i Scientific Drilling Project core (HSDP2): Anatomy of a Hawaiian
shield volcano, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001379" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GC001379</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Goldberg, D.: The Role of Downhole Measurements in Marine Geology and
Geophysics, Rev. Geophys., 35, 315–342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG00221" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97RG00221</ext-link>,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Helm-Clark, C. M., Rodgers, D. W., and Smith, R. P.: Borehole geophysical
techniques to define stratigraphy, alteration and aquifers in basalt, J.
Appl. Geophys., 55, 3–38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.06.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.06.003</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Hawai`i Groundwater &amp; Geothermal Resources Center (HGGRC): Humu`ula
Groundwater Research Project, available at:
<uri>https://www.higp.hawaii.edu/hggrc/projects/humuula-groundwater-research-project/</uri>,
last access: February 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Ildefonse, B., Rona, P. A., and Blackman, D.: Drilling the Crust at Mid-Ocean
Ridges: An “In Depth” Perspective, Oceanography, 20, 66–77,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2007.81" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5670/oceanog.2007.81</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Jerram, D. A.: Volcanology and facies architecture of flood basalts, Volcanic
Rifted Margins, 362, 119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2362-0.119" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/0-8137-2362-0.119</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Katz, M. G. and Cashman, K. V.: Hawaiian lava flows in the third dimension:
Identification and interpretation of pahoehoe and `a`a distribution in the
KP-1 and SOH-4 cores, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 4, 8705,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000209" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GC000209</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Kück, J.: Composite OSG Logging Data from the PTA-2 borehole, Big Island, Hawai'i, GFZ Data Services, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.4.8.2019.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5880/GFZ.4.8.2019.011</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Manghnani, M. H. and Woollard, G. P.: Elastic wave velocities in Hawaiian
rocks at pressures to ten kilobars. The Crust and Upper Mantle of the Pacific
Area, American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph Series, 12, 501–516,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM012p0501" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GM012p0501</ext-link>, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Massiot, C., McNamara, D. D., and Lewis, B.: Processing and analysis of high
temperature geothermal acoustic borehole image logs in the Taupo Volcanic
Zone, New Zealand, Geothermics, 53, 190–201,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.05.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.05.010</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Millett, J. M., Hole, M. J., Jolley, D. W., Schofield, N., and Campbell, E.:
Frontier exploration and the North Atlantic Igneous Province: new insights
from a 2.6 km offshore volcanic sequence in the NE Faroe–Shetland Basin, J.
Geol. Soc., 173, 320–336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2015-069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/jgs2015-069</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Millett, J. M., Wilkins, A. D., Campbell, E., Hole, M. J., Taylor, R. A.,
Healy, D., Jerram, D. A., Jolley, D. W., Planke, S., Archer, S. G., and
Blischke, A.: The geology of offshore drilling through basalt sequences:
Understanding operational complications to improve efficiency, Mar. Petrol.
Geol., 77, 1177-1192, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.08.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.08.010</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Millett, J. M., Planke, S., Kästner, F., Blischke, A., Hersir, G. P.,
Halldórsdóttir, S., Flóvenz, Ó. G., Árnadóttir, S.,
Helgadóttir, H. M., Vakulenko, S., and Buryak, S.: Sub-surface geology
and velocity structure of the Krafla high temperature geothermal field,
Iceland: Integrated ditch cuttings, wireline and zero offset vertical seismic
profile analysis, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.024</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Nelson, C. E., Jerram, D. A., and Hobbs, R. W.: Flood basalt facies from
borehole data: implications for prospectivity and volcanology in volcanic
rifted margins, Petrol. Geosci., 15, 313–324,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079309-842" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/1354-079309-842</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Nelson, C. E., Jerram, D. A., Clayburn, J. A. P., Halton, A. M., and Roberge,
J.: Eocene volcanism in 1598 offshore southern Baffin Bay, Mar. Petrol.
Geol., 67, 678–691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.06.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.06.002</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Pierce, H. A. and Thomas, D. M.: Magnetotelluric and audiomagnetotelluric
groundwater survey along the Humu'ula portion of Saddle Road near and around
the Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report
2009–1135, 160 p., on one CD, also available at:
<uri>https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1135</uri> (last access: February 2019), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Planke, S.: Geophysical response of flood basalts from analysis of wire line
logs: Ocean Drilling Program Site 642, Vøring volcanic margin, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 99, 9279–9296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB00496" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94JB00496</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Planke, S. and Cambray, H.: Seismic properties of flood basalts on rifted
volcanic margins based on Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Hole 917A downhole
data, Proc. Ocean Drill. Program Sci. Results, 152, 453–462,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.152.247.1998" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2973/odp.proc.sr.152.247.1998</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Planke, S., Cerney, B., Bücker, C. J., and Nilsen, O.: Alteration effects
on petrophysical properties of subaerial flood basalts: Site 990, Southeast
Greenland margin, Proc. Ocean Drill. Program Sci. Results, 163, 17–28,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.163.105.1999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2973/odp.proc.sr.163.105.1999</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Reinecker, J., Tingay, M., and Müller, B.: Borehole Breakout Analysis
from Four-arm Caliper Logs, World Stress Map Project, WSM, available at:
<uri>http://dc-app3-14.gfz-potsdam.de/pub/guidelines/WSM_analysis_guideline_breakout_caliper.pdf</uri>
(last access: February 2019), 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Shervais, J. W., Schmitt, D. R., Nielson, D., Evans, J. P., Christiansen, E.
H., Morgan, L., Pat Shanks, W. C., Prokopenko, A. A., Lachmar, T., Liberty,
L. M., Blackwell, D. D., Glen, J. M., Champion, L. D., Potter, K. E., and
Kessler, J. A.: First Results from HOTSPOT: The Snake River Plain Scientific
Drilling Project, Idaho, U.S.A., Sci. Dril., 15, 36–45,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2204/iodp.sd.15.06.2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2204/iodp.sd.15.06.2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Stefansson, V., Gudlaugsson, S. T., and Gudmundsson, A.: Silica content and
gamma ray logs in volcanic rocks, Proceedings of the World Geothermal
Congress, Kyushu–Tohoku, Japan, 28, 2893–2897, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Stolper, E. M., DePaolo, D. J., and Thomas, D. M.: Deep Drilling into a
Mantle Plume Volcano: The Hawaii Scientific Drilling Project, Sci. Dril., 7,
4–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2204/iodp.sd.7.02.2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2204/iodp.sd.7.02.2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Teagle, D. A. H., Ildefonse, B., Blum, P., and the Expedition 335 Scientists:
Proc. IODP, 335: Tokyo (Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management
International, Inc.), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2204/iodp.proc.335.101.2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2204/iodp.proc.335.101.2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, D. and Haskins, E.: Analysis of the hydrologic structures within an
ocean island volcano using diamond wireline core drilling, American
Geophysical Union conference, San Fransisco, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, D. M., Paillet, F. L., and Conrad, M. E.: Hydrogeology of the Hawaii
Scientific Drilling Project borehole KP-1: 2. Groundwater geochemistry and
regional flow patterns, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 11–683,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB03845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JB03845</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Tominaga, M.: “Imaging” the cross section of oceanic lithosphere: The
development and future of electrical microresistivity logging through
scientific ocean drilling, Tectonophysics, 608, 84–96,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.06.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2013.06.018</ext-link>, 2013</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Walker, G. P.: Spongy pahoehoe in Hawaii: a study of vesicle-distribution
patterns in basalt and their significance, B. Volcanol., 51, 199–209,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067956" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF01067956</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Watton, T. J., Cannon, S., Brown, R. J., Jerram, D. A., and Waichel, B. L.:
Using formation micro-imaging, wireline logs and onshore analogues to
distinguish volcanic lithofacies in boreholes: examples from Palaeogene
successions in the Faroe–Shetland Basin, NE Atlantic, Geological Society,
London, Special Publications, 397, 173–192, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP397.7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP397.7</ext-link>,
2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Watton, T. J., Wright, K. A., Jerram, D. A., and Brown, R. J.: The
petrophysical and petrographical properties of hyaloclastite deposits:
Implications for petroleum exploration, AAPG Bulletin, 98, 449–463,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1306/08141313029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1306/08141313029</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page33?><ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Zemaneck, J., Caldwell, R. L., Glenn, E. E., Holcomb, S. V., Norton, L. J.,
and Strauss, A. J. D.: The borehole televiewer – a new logging concept for
fracture location and other type of borehole inspection, J. Petrol. Technol.,
21, 762–774, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2118/2402-PA" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2118/2402-PA</ext-link>, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Ziegler, M., Heidbach, O., Rajabi, M., Hersir, G. P., Ágústsson, K.,
Árnadóttir, S., and Zang, A.: The stress pattern of Iceland,
Tectonophysics, 674, 101–113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2016.02.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2016.02.008</ext-link>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Zoback, M. D., Moos, D., Mastin, L., and Anderson, R. N.: Well bore breakouts
and in situ stress, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 90, 5523–5530,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB07p05523" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB090iB07p05523</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Understanding volcanic facies in the subsurface: a combined core, wireline logging and image log data set from the PTA2 and KMA1 boreholes, Big Island, Hawai`i</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>To help understand volcanic facies in the subsurface, data sets
that enable detailed comparisons between down-hole geophysical data and cored
volcanic intervals are critical. However, in many cases, the collection of
extended core intervals within volcanic sequences is rare and often
incomplete due to challenging coring conditions. In this contribution we
outline and provide initial results from borehole logging operations within
two fully cored lava-dominated borehole sequences, PTA2 and KMA1, on the Big
Island of Hawai`i. Data for spectral gamma, magnetic susceptibility, dipmeter
resistivity, sonic, total magnetic field, temperature and televiewer wireline
logs were successfully acquired for the open hole interval ca. 889&thinsp;m to 1567&thinsp;m within the PTA2 borehole. Spectral gamma was also collected from inside the
casing of both wells, extending the coverage for PTA2 to the surface and
covering the interval from ca. 300 to 1200&thinsp;m for KMA1. High-quality core
material was available for both boreholes with almost complete recovery which
enabled high-resolution core-to-log integration. Gamma data are generally low
commonly in the range ca. 7–20&thinsp;gAPI but are shown to increase up to API of
ca. 60 with some intrusions and with increases in hawaiite compositions in
the upper part of PTA2. Velocity data are more variable due to alteration
within porous volcanic facies than with burial depth, with a general degrease
down-hole. The high-resolution televiewer data have been compared directly to
the core, enabling a comprehensive analysis of the variations in the
televiewer responses. This has enabled the identification of key features
including individual vesicles, vesicle segregations, strained vesicles,
chilled margins, rubble zones, intrusive contacts and pāhoehoe lobe
morphologies, which can be confidently matched between the televiewer data
and the full diameter core. The data set and results of this study include
findings which should enable improved borehole facies analysis through
volcanic sequences in the future, especially where down-borehole data and images
but no core are available.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andersen, M. S., Boldreel, L. O., and Seifaba Group: Log responses in basalt
successions in 8 wells from the Faroe-Shetland Channel – a classification
scheme for interpretation of geophysical logs and case studies. Faroe Islands
Exploration Conference: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference, Annales Societatis
Scientiarum Færoensis, Supplementum, 50, 364–391, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bartetzko, A., Delius, H., and Pechnig, R.: Effect of compositional and
structural variations on log responses of igneous and metamorphic rocks. I:
mafic rocks, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 240, 255–278,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.240.01.19" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.240.01.19</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Brewer, T. S., Harvey, P. K., Lovell, M. A., Haggas, S., Williamson, G., and
Pezard, P.: Ocean floor volcanism: constraints from the integration of core
and downhole logging measurements, Geological Society, London, Special
Publications, 136, 341–362, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.136.01.28" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.136.01.28</a>,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Cas, R. A. F. and Wright, J. V.: Lava flows. In Volcanic Successions Modern
and Ancient, 58–91, Springer Netherlands, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Delpino, D. H. and Bermúdez, A. M.: Petroleum systems including
unconventional reservoirs in intrusive igneous rocks (sills and laccoliths),
The Leading Edge, 28, 804–811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3167782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3167782</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Eakins, B. W., Robinson, J. E., Kanamatsu, T., Naka, J., Smith, J. R.,
Takahashi, E., and Clague, D. A.: Hawaii's volcanoes revealed: U.S.
Geological Survey Geologic Investigations Series Map I-2809, 1 plate,
<a href="https://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/2809/" target="_blank">https://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/2809/</a> (last access: 2 February 2019), 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Fornero, S. A., Marins, G. M., Lobo, J. T., Freire, A. F. M., and de Lima, E.
F.: Characterization of subaerial volcanic facies using acoustic image logs:
Lithofacies and log-facies of a lava-flow deposit in the Brazilian pre-salt,
deepwater of Santos Basin, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 99, 156–174,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.09.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.09.029</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Frey, F. A., Wise, W. S., Garcia, M. O., West, H., Kwon, S. T., and Kennedy,
A.: Evolution of Mauna Kea Volcano, Hawaii: Petrologic and geochemical
constraints on postshield volcanism, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 95,
1271–1300, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB095iB02p01271" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB095iB02p01271</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, M. O., Haskins, E. H., Stolper, E. M., and Baker, M.: Stratigraphy of
the Hawai'i Scientific Drilling Project core (HSDP2): Anatomy of a Hawaiian
shield volcano, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001379" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001379</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Goldberg, D.: The Role of Downhole Measurements in Marine Geology and
Geophysics, Rev. Geophys., 35, 315–342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG00221" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG00221</a>,
1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Helm-Clark, C. M., Rodgers, D. W., and Smith, R. P.: Borehole geophysical
techniques to define stratigraphy, alteration and aquifers in basalt, J.
Appl. Geophys., 55, 3–38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.06.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.06.003</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Hawai`i Groundwater &amp; Geothermal Resources Center (HGGRC): Humu`ula
Groundwater Research Project, available at:
<a href="https://www.higp.hawaii.edu/hggrc/projects/humuula-groundwater-research-project/" target="_blank">https://www.higp.hawaii.edu/hggrc/projects/humuula-groundwater-research-project/</a>,
last access: February 2019.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Ildefonse, B., Rona, P. A., and Blackman, D.: Drilling the Crust at Mid-Ocean
Ridges: An “In Depth” Perspective, Oceanography, 20, 66–77,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2007.81" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2007.81</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Jerram, D. A.: Volcanology and facies architecture of flood basalts, Volcanic
Rifted Margins, 362, 119, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2362-0.119" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2362-0.119</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Katz, M. G. and Cashman, K. V.: Hawaiian lava flows in the third dimension:
Identification and interpretation of pahoehoe and `a`a distribution in the
KP-1 and SOH-4 cores, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 4, 8705,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000209" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000209</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Kück, J.: Composite OSG Logging Data from the PTA-2 borehole, Big Island, Hawai'i, GFZ Data Services, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.4.8.2019.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.4.8.2019.011</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Manghnani, M. H. and Woollard, G. P.: Elastic wave velocities in Hawaiian
rocks at pressures to ten kilobars. The Crust and Upper Mantle of the Pacific
Area, American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph Series, 12, 501–516,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM012p0501" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GM012p0501</a>, 1968.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Massiot, C., McNamara, D. D., and Lewis, B.: Processing and analysis of high
temperature geothermal acoustic borehole image logs in the Taupo Volcanic
Zone, New Zealand, Geothermics, 53, 190–201,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.05.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.05.010</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Millett, J. M., Hole, M. J., Jolley, D. W., Schofield, N., and Campbell, E.:
Frontier exploration and the North Atlantic Igneous Province: new insights
from a 2.6&thinsp;km offshore volcanic sequence in the NE Faroe–Shetland Basin, J.
Geol. Soc., 173, 320–336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2015-069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2015-069</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Millett, J. M., Wilkins, A. D., Campbell, E., Hole, M. J., Taylor, R. A.,
Healy, D., Jerram, D. A., Jolley, D. W., Planke, S., Archer, S. G., and
Blischke, A.: The geology of offshore drilling through basalt sequences:
Understanding operational complications to improve efficiency, Mar. Petrol.
Geol., 77, 1177-1192, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.08.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.08.010</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Millett, J. M., Planke, S., Kästner, F., Blischke, A., Hersir, G. P.,
Halldórsdóttir, S., Flóvenz, Ó. G., Árnadóttir, S.,
Helgadóttir, H. M., Vakulenko, S., and Buryak, S.: Sub-surface geology
and velocity structure of the Krafla high temperature geothermal field,
Iceland: Integrated ditch cuttings, wireline and zero offset vertical seismic
profile analysis, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.024</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Nelson, C. E., Jerram, D. A., and Hobbs, R. W.: Flood basalt facies from
borehole data: implications for prospectivity and volcanology in volcanic
rifted margins, Petrol. Geosci., 15, 313–324,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079309-842" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079309-842</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Nelson, C. E., Jerram, D. A., Clayburn, J. A. P., Halton, A. M., and Roberge,
J.: Eocene volcanism in 1598 offshore southern Baffin Bay, Mar. Petrol.
Geol., 67, 678–691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.06.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.06.002</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Pierce, H. A. and Thomas, D. M.: Magnetotelluric and audiomagnetotelluric
groundwater survey along the Humu'ula portion of Saddle Road near and around
the Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report
2009–1135, 160 p., on one CD, also available at:
<a href="https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1135" target="_blank">https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1135</a> (last access: February 2019), 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Planke, S.: Geophysical response of flood basalts from analysis of wire line
logs: Ocean Drilling Program Site 642, Vøring volcanic margin, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 99, 9279–9296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB00496" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB00496</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Planke, S. and Cambray, H.: Seismic properties of flood basalts on rifted
volcanic margins based on Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Hole 917A downhole
data, Proc. Ocean Drill. Program Sci. Results, 152, 453–462,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.152.247.1998" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.152.247.1998</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Planke, S., Cerney, B., Bücker, C. J., and Nilsen, O.: Alteration effects
on petrophysical properties of subaerial flood basalts: Site 990, Southeast
Greenland margin, Proc. Ocean Drill. Program Sci. Results, 163, 17–28,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.163.105.1999" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.163.105.1999</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Reinecker, J., Tingay, M., and Müller, B.: Borehole Breakout Analysis
from Four-arm Caliper Logs, World Stress Map Project, WSM, available at:
<a href="http://dc-app3-14.gfz-potsdam.de/pub/guidelines/WSM_analysis_guideline_breakout_caliper.pdf" target="_blank">http://dc-app3-14.gfz-potsdam.de/pub/guidelines/WSM_analysis_guideline_breakout_caliper.pdf</a>
(last access: February 2019), 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Shervais, J. W., Schmitt, D. R., Nielson, D., Evans, J. P., Christiansen, E.
H., Morgan, L., Pat Shanks, W. C., Prokopenko, A. A., Lachmar, T., Liberty,
L. M., Blackwell, D. D., Glen, J. M., Champion, L. D., Potter, K. E., and
Kessler, J. A.: First Results from HOTSPOT: The Snake River Plain Scientific
Drilling Project, Idaho, U.S.A., Sci. Dril., 15, 36–45,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2204/iodp.sd.15.06.2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2204/iodp.sd.15.06.2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Stefansson, V., Gudlaugsson, S. T., and Gudmundsson, A.: Silica content and
gamma ray logs in volcanic rocks, Proceedings of the World Geothermal
Congress, Kyushu–Tohoku, Japan, 28, 2893–2897, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Stolper, E. M., DePaolo, D. J., and Thomas, D. M.: Deep Drilling into a
Mantle Plume Volcano: The Hawaii Scientific Drilling Project, Sci. Dril., 7,
4–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2204/iodp.sd.7.02.2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2204/iodp.sd.7.02.2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Teagle, D. A. H., Ildefonse, B., Blum, P., and the Expedition 335 Scientists:
Proc. IODP, 335: Tokyo (Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management
International, Inc.), <a href="https://doi.org/10.2204/iodp.proc.335.101.2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2204/iodp.proc.335.101.2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, D. and Haskins, E.: Analysis of the hydrologic structures within an
ocean island volcano using diamond wireline core drilling, American
Geophysical Union conference, San Fransisco, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, D. M., Paillet, F. L., and Conrad, M. E.: Hydrogeology of the Hawaii
Scientific Drilling Project borehole KP-1: 2. Groundwater geochemistry and
regional flow patterns, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 11–683,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB03845" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB03845</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Tominaga, M.: “Imaging” the cross section of oceanic lithosphere: The
development and future of electrical microresistivity logging through
scientific ocean drilling, Tectonophysics, 608, 84–96,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.06.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.06.018</a>, 2013
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Walker, G. P.: Spongy pahoehoe in Hawaii: a study of vesicle-distribution
patterns in basalt and their significance, B. Volcanol., 51, 199–209,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067956" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067956</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Watton, T. J., Cannon, S., Brown, R. J., Jerram, D. A., and Waichel, B. L.:
Using formation micro-imaging, wireline logs and onshore analogues to
distinguish volcanic lithofacies in boreholes: examples from Palaeogene
successions in the Faroe–Shetland Basin, NE Atlantic, Geological Society,
London, Special Publications, 397, 173–192, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP397.7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP397.7</a>,
2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Watton, T. J., Wright, K. A., Jerram, D. A., and Brown, R. J.: The
petrophysical and petrographical properties of hyaloclastite deposits:
Implications for petroleum exploration, AAPG Bulletin, 98, 449–463,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1306/08141313029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1306/08141313029</a>, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Zemaneck, J., Caldwell, R. L., Glenn, E. E., Holcomb, S. V., Norton, L. J.,
and Strauss, A. J. D.: The borehole televiewer – a new logging concept for
fracture location and other type of borehole inspection, J. Petrol. Technol.,
21, 762–774, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2118/2402-PA" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2118/2402-PA</a>, 1969.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Ziegler, M., Heidbach, O., Rajabi, M., Hersir, G. P., Ágústsson, K.,
Árnadóttir, S., and Zang, A.: The stress pattern of Iceland,
Tectonophysics, 674, 101–113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2016.02.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2016.02.008</a>,
2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Zoback, M. D., Moos, D., Mastin, L., and Anderson, R. N.: Well bore breakouts
and in situ stress, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 90, 5523–5530,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB07p05523" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB07p05523</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
